Rudkin on Vampyr

Vampyr
Vampyr
David Rudkin
Paperback: £8.99

Vampyr Der Traum des Allan Gray (1932) is one of the founding and defining works of psychological horror cinema, adapted from Gothic stories by Sheridan Le Fanu, a disturbing narrative of vampirism, obsession and posession of the soul. But it is also a film directed by Carl Theodor Dreyer, the revered and legendary Danish director of La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc (1927). Shot in France with private money and a largely nonprofessional cast and primitive sound equipment, Vampyr is to some extent a ruin. There is no definitive print and English versions are marred by poor image quality and subtitles. And yet it is unquestionably extraordinary, a vivid and haunting manifestation of Dreyer’s power to make visible on screen the inner human state, and to convey a dreamlike imagery of textures of nature amidst which transient, solitary human figures pass, some illuminated by an inner light, others threatened by a malign or demonic presence. In relation to Dreyer’s long but often frustrated career, Vampyr is often thought of as an uneven or disappointing film. But, according to David Rudkin, this is to misunderstand what it sets out to do, which is systematically to set the spectator adrift in a mysterious world. In a meticulous formal analysis of Vampyr, Rudkin expands on this contention, pinpointing the sources of the film’s uniquely disquieting effect. And yet, however strange it is, Vampyr remains a profound and troubling artwork concerned at the last to communicate human meanings – and none more so than the essence of death – in remarkable filmic imagery.

David Rudkin is a dramatist and screenwriter of forty years’ standing. His theatre work is mainly associated with the Royal Shakespeare Company. Having collaborated with Tony Richardson, FranÁois Truffaut and Fred Zinnemann, his recent screenplays include Testimony (1987), for which he was awarded the New York Film Festival Gold Medal for Screenplay.

80 pages,†Illustrated
Published May 2005
Paperback ISBN: 1844570738

Link courtesy John Coulthart

ARTHUR MAILING LIST BULLETIN No. 0017

“COMMAND PERFORMANCE” -THE ARTHUR MAILING LIST BULLETIN

No. 0017

FRIDAY APRIL 22, 2005

1. TONIGHT, LET IT BE PINCHBECK

People always ask us what columnist Daniel Pinchbeck is *really* like. Well now you can see for yourself, as the man will be live and in the flesh and talking TONIGHT in NEW YORK CITY. Here are the details from the hosts:

“how i learned to stop worrying and love the dimensional shift”

a talk with Arthur columnist Daniel Pinchbeck

Friday, April 22, 2005

8:00 p.m., $10

The Project Room

619 East 6th Street, between B and C

“Daniel’s current book, 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl is on indigenous prophecies, crop circles, shamanism, The Book of Revelation, and other related subjects. He will discuss his research that supports the Mayan Calendar’s projection of the year 2012 as the “end of history” and the movement into a new experience of time and space, as well as the inception of an harmonic and utopian global civilization on the Earth. Open discussion for questions and answers will follow.”

2. NEW ISSUE OF ARTHUR OUT THIS WEEKEND.

Best yet? You be the judge and jury. Rising star M.I.A. on the cover, with a gigantic interview with her by Piotr Orlov on the inside. Erik Davis on a place called Druid Heights. Peter Lamborn Wilson on secessionist movements. Stacy Kranitz visits with surviving black metallers in Scandinavia, with an introduction by metal scholar Ian Christe. Douglas Rushkoff turns his back on the internet. Pinchbeck on transhumanism and nanotech and the Singularity. Comics. C & D on the landmark (!) new album of fuzzed up, psychedelic (!), ear-scalding, mind-melting heavy rock by Sleater-Kinney (!?!?!?). John Payne on new prog by Magma and the Mars Volta. Mike Patton gets in the kitchen. Byron Coley & Thurston Moore get mindzapped. And so on. All free for you. 50,000 copies, going fast. Details here:

http://www.arthurmag.com

3. MATTHEW GREENE EXHIBIT IN LONDON.

Arthur contributing artist Matthew Greene (he did some beautiful illos for the piece on legal magic mushrooms in England in the Jello Biafra issue of Arthur) has a hot new exhibit in London that just opened two days ago. Go here if you can:

Modern Art inc.

10 vyner st.

London E2 9DG

It’s the Bethnal Green stop in the tube.

http://www.modernartinc.com/exhibitions_future.html

4. BASTET NEWS.

Ethan Miller of Comets On Fire has curated a new compilation of spiritual brainfry for Arthur’s Bastet label. The CD is now being mastered. We should have it out before the end of May. Stay tuned. This will be a limited edition thing, with handscreened sleeves and all that quality goodness that we’ve come to expect from the Comets crew.

5. RIGHT ON, ERIC BERNDT!

http://www.wonkette.com/politics/about/scalia-subjected-to-probing-question-the-aftermath-040057.php

Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia visited NYU to receive an honor from the members of the NYU Annual Survey of American Law , which is dedicating their 2005 issue to Scalia.

Scalia is the subject of controversy for his dissenting opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, in which he criticized the decision to overturn a law that criminalized sodomy.

In asking about Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence v. Texas and his view that privacy is not constitutionally protected, Eric Berndt, a law student, shocked the crowd by asking, “Do you sodomize your wife?”

Scalia refused to answer the question while the crowd gasped and the administrators promptly turned off Berndt’s microphone.

Berndt later explained his actions in a post on the Internet:

As the student who asked Justice Scalia about his sexual conduct, I am responding to your posts to explain why I believe I had a right to confront Justice Scalia in the manner I did Tuesday, why any gay or sympathetic person has that same right. It should be clear that I intended to be offensive, obnoxious, and inflammatory. There is a time to discuss and there are times when acts and opposition are necessary. Debate is useless when one participant denies the full dignity of the other. How am I to docilely engage a man who sarcastically rants about the “beauty of homosexual relationships” (at the Q&A) and believes that gay school teachers will try to convert children to a homosexual lifestyle (at oral argument for Lawrence)?

Although my question was legally relevant, as I explain below, an independent motivation for my speech-act was to simply subject a homophobic government official to the same indignity to which he would subject millions of gay Americans. It was partially a naked act of resistance and a refusal to be silenced. I wanted to make him and everyone in the room aware of the dehumanizing effect of trivializing such an important relationship. Justice Scalia has no pity for the millions of gay Americans on whom sodomy laws and official homophobia have such an effect, so it is difficult to sympathize with his brief moment of “humiliation,” as some have called it. The fact that I am a law student and Scalia is a Supreme Court Justice does not require me to circumscribe my justified opposition and outrage within the bounds of jurisprudential discourse.

Law school and the law profession do not negate my identity as a member of an oppressed minority confronting injustice. Even so, I did have a legal point: Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Lawrence asked whether criminalizing homosexual conduct advanced a state interest “which could justify the intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual.” Scalia did not answer this question in his dissent because he believed the state need only assert a legitimate interest to defeat non-fundamental liberties. I basically asked him this question again – it is now the law of the land. He said he did not know whether the interest was significant enough. I then asked him if he sodomizes his wife to subject his intimate relations to the scrutiny he cavalierly would allow others – by force, if necessary. Everyone knew at that moment how significant the interest is. Beyond exerting official power against homosexuals, Scalia is an outspoken and high-profile homophobe. After 

the aforementioned sarcastic remarks about gay people’s relationships, can anyone doubt how little respect he has for LGBT Americans? Even if no case touching gay rights ever came before him, his comments from the bench (that employment non-discrimination is some kind of “homosexual agenda,” etc.) and within our very walls are unacceptable to any self-respecting gay person or principled opponent of discrimination. The idea that I should have treated a man with such repugnant views with deference because he is a high government official evinces either a dangerously un-American acceptance of authority or insensitivity to the gay community’s grievances. Friends have forwarded me emails complaining of the “liberal” student who asked “the question.” That some of my classmates are shallow and insensitive enough to conceptualize my complaint as mere partisan politics is disheartening. Though I should not have to, I will share with everyone that I am neither a Democrat nor Republica!

n and do not consider myself a “liberal” except in the classical sense. I hope that we can separate a simple demand for equality under the law and outrage over being denied it from so much dogmatic ideological baggage. LGBT Americans are still a persecuted minority and our struggle for equal rights is still vital. 4 out of 5 LGBT kids are harassed in school – tell them to debate their harassers. Suicide rates for them are much higher than for others. We still cannot serve in the military, have little protection from employment and other forms of discrimination, and are denied the 1000+ benefits that accrue from official recognition of marriage. I know some who support gay rights oppose my question and our protest. Do not presume to tell me when and with how much urgency to stand up for our rights.

I am 17 months out of a lifelong closet and have lost too much time to heterosexist hegemony to tolerate those who say, as Dr. King put it, “just wait.” If you cannot stomach a breach of decorum when justified outrage erupts then your support is nearly worthless anyway. At least do not allow yourselves to become complicit in discrimination by demanding obedience from its victims. Many of our classmates chose NYU over higher-ranked schools because of our reputation as a “private university in the public service” and our commitment to certain values. We were the first law school to require that employers pledge not to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Of Scalia’s law schools that have “signed on to the homosexual agenda,” our signature stands out like John Hancock’s. We won a federal injunction in the FAIR litigation as an “expressive association” that counts acceptance of sexual orientation as a core value. Those who worry about our school’s prestige should re

member how we got here and consider whether flattering those who mock what we believe and are otherwise willing to fight for appears prestigious or pathetic. We protestors did not embarrass NYU, Scalia embarrassed NYU. We stood up to a bigot for the values that make NYU more than a great place to learn the law. I repeat my willingess to discuss this issue calmly with anyone who respects my identity as a gay man. I have had many productive talks with classmates since Tuesday and I hope that will continue.

Respectfully,

Eric Berndt

And with that inspirational message, we bid you adieu

Arthur Editorial Action Squad

Los Angeles

Still ratfucking.

ABC7Chicago.com: Clinton impeachment was retaliation for Nixon, says retiring congressman

Clinton impeachment was retaliation for Nixon, says retiring congressman

By Andy Shaw
April 21, 2005 ó Republican Congressman Henry Hyde made some surprising comments Thursday on the impeachment hearings of President Bill Clinton. He now says Republicans may have gone after Clinton to retaliate for the impeachment of Richard Nixon. Hyde is stepping down after this term.

Hyde’s comments came as he talked with ABC7 political reporter Andy Shaw about his 30 year in Congress.

In an exclusive interview, Hyde delivered a big dose of candor and some reflective second guessing. He said, among other things, he might not try to impeach President Clinton if he had it to do all over again.

The 81-year-old DuPage County Republican, who mastered the art of disagreeing without being disagreeable, will be stepping down in January of 2007 after 16 terms and 32 years.

“I am leaving voluntarily, but it’s because my physical strength is ebbing. Father Time and Mother Nature have been pursuing me, and I’m 81,” said Rep. Henry Hyde, (R)-Illinois.

Hyde is known for his eloquence, courtesy, civility and his fierce partisanship on behalf of conservative GOP principles, including authorship of the Hyde Amendment, which outlawed federal funding of abortions, and leadership of the House judiciary committee in the impeachment of President Clinton for perjury and obstruction of justice stemming from an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

When asked if he would go through with the Clinton impeachment process again, Hyde said he wasn’t sure. It turned into a personal and political embarrassment for Hyde when an extra-marital affair he had in the 1960’s became public amid accusations of hypocrisy. He called the affair a youthful indiscretion.

“Accusations hurled at me to intimidate me were misplaced, and I regret having to deal with them, but they didn’t intimidate me,” Hyde said.

The veteran DuPage County congressman acknowledged that Republicans went after Clinton in part to enact revenge against the Democrats for impeaching President Richard Nixon 25 years earlier.

Andy Shaw asked Hyde if the Clinton proceedings were payback for Nixon’s impeachment.

“I can’t say it wasn’t, but I also thought that the Republican party should stand for something, and if we walked away from this, no matter how difficult, we could be accused of shirking our duty, our responsibility,” said Hyde.

Hyde’s comments reflect what Democrats have been saying for years about the Clinton impeachment. It will be interesting to see what happens when Hyde’s comments hit the national media.

Hyde’s style will be missed in Washington, as well as his sense of civility, even though a lot of people will not miss his rigid ideology.

Ayahuasca and problem solving…

Stirred and shaken

Faced by difficult choices both in his life and fiction, and encouraged by the examples of Peter Matthiessen and Allen Ginsberg, Henry Shukman tried ayahuasca, the hallucinogenic Amazonian vine

Henry Shukman
Saturday March 12, 2005
The Guardian

Santa Fe, the “City Different”, known to some as FantaSe, is the city where you can hire a horse to be your shrink (“equine-assisted psychotherapy”), where your child can play with a hula-hoop “charged with Plutonian energy” (more grounding than Neptunian), and where the nose can be the centre of all health diagnosis (“Noseology”).

New Mexico’s state capital stands at 7,000 feet on a desert plateau that reaches all the way to Arizona, with the Sangre de Cristo mountains rising to blood-red, 13,000-foot peaks behind. At the end of the long trail from St Louis, Santa Fe – with its many giant mud buildings that look as if they belong in Timbuktu, but are in fact modern hotels, banks, shopping centres – has been the natural home of the eccentric since the turn of the 20th century, when the five painters known as the Cinco Pintores fled the straight-laced East Coast and settled nearby. New Mexico is the only place where DH Lawrence ever owned a house. Dennis Hopper and the infamous Bean Farm Commune (where the acid trip in Easy Rider was filmed); Bob Dylan, Janis Joplin, Aldous Huxley, Kerouac, Kesey – there’s hardly an artistic or counter-cultural luminary of the past few decades who hasn’t passed through.

It is now the mecca of heterodox DIY spirituality. So it’s not surprising there are no fewer than two “churches” in town devoted to the use of ayahuasca, an Amazonian vine of terrifying narcotic potency. One of them was in the news lately. A member of the congregation, a prominent industrialist, challenged a legal ruling that had made ayahuasca, his sacrament, a banned drug. He won, and in spite of its being one of the strongest hallucinogens known to humanity, it is now officially legal in New Mexico (a state whose last governor was pro-cannabis).

The literary apology for – or anyway fascination with – hard drugs is nothing new. From Homer’s lotus-eaters right through to Irvine Welsh’s e- and smack-consumers, western literature has always had room for drugs. But the extent of the accommodation surely expanded hugely in the 1950s, when that pre- or proto-Beat Huxley famously experimented with mescalin. The idea that drugs could offer not just a short-cut to pleasure and escape but a glimpse into a fundamental spiritual reality entered the zeitgeist, as well as the canon, then. Take this pill and become as enlightened as a mystic.

No wonder writers, ever hungry for experience and understanding (like everyone else but maybe more so), have been drawn to them. But in spite of its potency, ayahuasca has had relatively little literary treatment.

I first heard of it in an ethnographic film during which an anthropology don from Cambridge, squatting in a clearing in the Colombian Amazon, clad in a loin-cloth and several necklaces (and visibly whiter and more bearded than everyone else in shot), submitted to having powdered ayahuasca blown up his nose. An Amerindian elder put his lips to one end of a blow-pipe, while the innocent anthropologist waited curiously at the other, the tube jammed in a nostril. Suddenly he spun away clutching his face as if he’d been knifed, shrieking.

If he had been hoping to step through the doors of heaven and hell, he’d found hell first. After a few moments of stumbling about in agony, he bent double and started to vomit. A voice-over blithely commented that yag?© , as they call it down there, typically caused severe nausea in the user, and that the Indians regarded this as an important function of the drug, which was a purga del anima, or purge of the soul. It didn’t look like a lot of fun.

On the whole, other people’s drug experiences are probably about as interesting as other people’s dreams, on or off the page. It may have the biggest cult following around, but Hunter S Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas left me wishing I’d read it at the right time, back when I was a student happy to supplement the syllabus with a chemical education. But some literary drug trips make spectacular reading, and one of the best (up there with Will Self’s breathtaking psychotic sex session in Great Apes ) happens to be an ayahuasca trip, rendered brilliantly by Peter Matthiessen in his under-read masterpiece of a novel, At Play in the Fields of the Lord. It goes on for a few dozen exhilarating pages, in the course of which an imbiber of a double-dose of ayahuasca tea flies his private plane over the vast carpet of the Amazonian forest, and finds himself bailing out (he somehow remembers his parachute) over an uncontacted Indian village. Matthiessen’s gravity, imagination and powers of description are at full throttle. Drugs can be good for a writer; you can tell he’d tried it, and can’t help being glad he did.

Ginsberg too experimented with it, in Peru in 1960, and it features in his correspondence with William Burroughs (published as The Yag?© Letters ); WS Merwin wrote a long poem about it (“The Real Life of Manuel Cordova”); and Mario Vargas Llosa touches on it in The Storyteller. But other than this, ayahuasca remains for the most part an obscure or unknown initiation.

Considering Santa Fe’s heritage, it oughtn’t to have been a surprise when a local friend told me he’d taken this elusive intoxicant recently, with a visiting Peruvian shaman, and wouldn’t I like to try it? He had turned into a panther stalking the rainforest (feline-assisted psychotherapy?), had never felt so good, and so on.

And the vomiting? I asked. He shrugged. Once or twice. No big deal.

To cut a long story short, he persuaded me. As it happened, I had been working on a novel set partly in Peru, and I thought maybe the influence of a Peruvian shaman and his potions might somehow help, especially since I was stuck, and had advanced little in weeks. I was also pondering whether to apply to extend the teaching job I had in New Mexico, and couldn’t make up my mind. Perhaps a little rainforest synaptic adjustment would shake out some decisive clarity. And on top of that, I was curious.

First I had to call someone called Ramon.

“Sure, hey,” Ramon said, like he had been expecting my call. “We’re meeting this Saturday to do some singing.”

Singing?

“Sure, we’ll be singing all night,” he said with an odd emphasis, and the penny dropped: code.

“Don’t eat that day,” he added.

The whole day?

So five days later, ravenous and already light-headed with fasting, I found myself standing outside a dance studio in Santa Fe, along with about 40 others, as another watery New Mexican twilight lingered beneath a high glassy sky. We filed in and sat around the walls on blankets. The “ceremony” would go on all night. The shaman and his white-robed helpers went round the room with incense and holy water, and everyone was given a small plastic bowl for the anticipated purge. After that came a glass of a disgusting, gruelly, riverine potion – the tea itself. The lights went out. Some of the assistant shamans started to sing songs. Others mimicked the calls of Amazonian birds so well that the room seemed to echo like the rainforest, and I wondered if the drug was already taking effect.

The first effect was the appearance out of nowhere of geometric multi-coloured patterns forming and re-forming in time with the songs. I could “see” them whether my eyes were open or closed. They were embarrassingly hippie-kaleidoscopic, but there they were. The “eye of the soul opening”, apparently: seeing in the dark. Then suddenly everything vanished. No singing, no kaleidoscope, no nothing. I felt that I had shot up out of my body and was floating in the midst of black, silvery space. It was silent and still, and I was completely calm. I needed nothing, never had and never would.

Then I somehow became aware of a ruinous, exhausted tangle of four human limbs far, far below me, slumped on a wooden floor.

Alas, I knew that somehow I was committed to that body, I had a responsibility to it, and it was drawing me back. The next thing I knew I was back in the room vomiting all over myself, groping for my little bowl.

I became a motionless lizard coated in many-coloured tiles, as if each cell of my hide were a piece of a mosaic. I couldn’t have moved a muscle if I’d wanted to. Then the nausea came back and I started to get scared. I don’t like being sick at the best of times, but here, each time I felt the nausea, it seemed it would last for ever. In that grossly altered state if something lasted a minute it was an eternity. A deep discomfort sprang up from nowhere, and once again I retched. Then once more, ethereal silence, complete peace.

I sweated, I groaned and curled up in a ball, trying to get comfortable, I lay down, and moaned to myself. After every seizure of the stomach, perfect peace. Then back the nausea would come.

The shaman attempted to rouse and fortify me at one point by grabbing my wrists. “Fuerte, fuerte [be strong],” he exhorted me. By then, I longed to sleep. Around me the singing had long since stopped. Instead there was a chorus of violent retching coming from all over the room.

When the drug began to wear off I looked at my watch and could understand what it said again. Three in the morning. The singing resumed. Slowly, one by one, people stood up and moved about. Some danced gently. It was maybe another hour after that that I felt able to stand. Afterwards a woman said to me: “This is as close as a man can get to knowing what it’s like giving birth.” There had been moments of perfect bliss, which it felt good to have known, but mostly there had been nausea and terror.

Yet strangely there were pay-offs. Firstly, the relief of having my mind back afterwards. Maybe my mind wasn’t so bad after all. I was exhausted, but also glowing, scoured, somehow clean within. When I walked outside into the dawn air, and saw the pale sky, the green mountains in the distance subtly infused with gold light, I felt like I was 19 again.

“First time?” a silver-haired old hand asked me afterwards, as I stood blinking in the cold dawn, wondering where I had just been.

“Yes.”

“Did you die?” he asked me.

So that was what had happened. “I thought I’d given birth to an asteroid,” I explained seriously. “Except I was the asteroid.”

“Uh-huh,” he nodded. “That’s good. We are asteroids.”

Right.

Be that as it may – and good or not – that afternoon the novel I was stuck on opened up like an Ordnance Survey map, and I could see the whole plot at last. I covered a giant sheet of A2 with notes and plans.

Are there shortcuts in this life? Do those ancient tribes of Amazonia know things we don’t? The only things I could be sure of were that with or without ayahuasca’s help, there would be months of hard slog ahead if I was ever going to finish the book; and that I hoped very much never to touch the stuff again.

¬? A paperback edition of Henry Shukman’s Darien Dogs (Vintage), and a new novel, Sandstorm (Jonathan Cape) are published in June.

Link courtesy John Coulthart

Hints of cosmic crash at Serpent Mound

Cleveland Plain Dealer

Tuesday, April 12, 2005
Hints of cosmic crash at Serpent Mound
Bill Sloat
Plain Dealer Reporter

Sifting through rocks snagged from twin boreholes punched deep into the planet’s crust, scientists have detected an unearthly substance hidden for eons in Ohio’s basement.

And its presence 1,412 feet beneath the forests and farmlands near Serpent Mound in south-central Ohio — already on par with Britain’s Stonehenge and Egypt’s pyramids as one of Earth’s most mysterious manmade structures — adds to a puzzle shrouded in legend and lore for centuries.

When scientists peered into the geo-strata that emerged from beneath the mound, they were confronted with pure, weird data. Under their microscope, they saw quartz crystals with flaws like those found at nuclear test sites and in moon rocks brought back by astronauts.

It pointed toward a massive energy burst that left behind telltale traces of a cosmic crash.

Now, those findings are rattling through the world of geology, shaking up long-held conceptions and misconceptions about Ohio’s distant past.

“I think we can say with authority today that this is an impact from a meteorite,” said Mark T. Baranoski, a state geologist. “It affected the region in a spectacular way.”

Rock samples from beneath the mound contain significantly higher than normal concentrations of iridium, an extremely rare metal. Because it is so heavy, iridium seldom shows up anywhere but near the planet’s molten core.

At Serpent Mound, the levels measured were 10 times beyond what is usually present in the Earth’s crust.

Occasionally, volcanoes bring it up in lava. But there are no lava fields in Ohio. So the questions started. Where did the iridium-rich rocks come from?

While iridium is scarce on Earth, the silver-gray metal is common in asteroids and comets.

In other words, it often is a strong sign that the sky has fallen.

Geologists, including researchers from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, describe the recent discovery as powerful new evidence that Serpent Mound sits upon a slightly oblong crater created when a massive extraterrestrial object slammed into Earth.

They have reported that the heavy metal find is “good evidence for an impact origin” and that dark, stony material recovered from the deepest borehole has a “significant enrichment” that must have come from outer space.

Iridium is already at the center of another scientific mind-bender – the disappearance of the dinosaurs.

In a widely accepted doomsday scenario, an asteroid the size of Manhattan plunged into the sea off Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula 65 million years ago. The explosion devastated the planet and unleashed a worldwide wipeout that caused 70 percent of all living things to die.

Scientists say they have found an iridium line in the Earth’s crust that few species crossed. Under the great extinction theory, the iridium showered down in debris after the asteroid struck.

Not all scientists accept the doomsday scenario, but many say it does seem to explain why the dinosaurs died off.

A similar event – although without those dramatic global effects – looks to have taken place in Ohio.

The crater touches portions of Adams, Pike and Highland counties, about 200 miles southwest of Cleveland in the state’s rolling Appalachian countryside.

The mound, built about 1,000 years ago, straddles land near the crater’s southwest edge and may have had a religious function, although nobody knows for sure what philosophy and beliefs shaped its origin.

Of course, that hasn’t stopped people from speculating about Serpent Mound’s builders and what they were up to. Some say they were mystics and priests. Others say magicians and soothsayers. Still others see them as prophets.

There are those who claim that the builders were shamans who practiced human sacrifice, while some believe that they were ancient astronomers who were the intellectual caste of woodland America.

Fact is, nobody can say. The mound builders left no written records.

Erosion and Ice Age glaciers have erased most of the crater from the surface.

But underground it’s a far different story, and the boreholes exposed the geologic record.

Fine grains of sand taken from 1,439 feet down appear deformed when viewed under a microscope. There even seem to be particles of soot left from scorched limestone, although researchers say additional work is needed before the strange black material is positively identified.

Still, everything seems to point to a cosmic jolt. While some aren’t convinced, they agree the evidence is piling up.

Mike Hansen, a retired state geologist who runs an earthquake warning system and teaches at Ohio State University, said there is no doubt that the Serpent Mound area was disturbed by some unknown force. But Hansen thinks the stresses were triggered by natural shifts in the Earth’s crust.

Around the time the rocks were deformed, Hansen said, Africa was pushing into North America and the Appalachian Mountains range was thrusting up higher than today’s Himalayas. He said a major tectonic event like that could have created the underground chaos at Serpent Mound.

Still, Hansen concedes that the meteorite hypothesis is gaining adherents among geologists.

The object, if it did strike Ohio, would have been gigantic. Maybe up to three times larger than Cleveland Browns Stadium. Traveling up to 45,000 mph, it would have been moving much faster than a speeding bullet.

The searing heat, blast and shockwaves from such a crash would have instantly carved a 1,000-foot-deep hole and crushed rocks miles below the five-mile-across crater.

That is exactly what samples from the two boreholes show. Researchers have spotted microscopic cracks in quartz crystals far beneath the surface and horsetail-shaped fractures called “shatter cones” in geological formations from the ground on down. The cracked crystals have patterns resembling those appearing after U.S. nuclear weapons tests in Nevada.

Other than iridium, there is no trace of an asteroid or comet.

It would probably have vaporized when it hit 256 million years ago.

“I don’t think we’ll ever find it,” Baranoski said. “It would have gone up in smoke. If anything was left near the surface, it would have been eroded away.”

Doyle Watts, a geophysicist at Dayton’s Wright State University who worked on the international team that studied the core samples, said the impact theory explains why so much of the terrain around Serpent Mound appears jumbled.

Some rock formations rise 1,000 feet above the ground. Others look like they have slid straight down.

Those oddities were first noticed not long after Europeans settled Ohio.

John Locke, a geologist who explored the area in the 1830s, thought he had found a “sunken mountain” and reported that “a region of no small extent had sunk down several hundred feet, producing faults, dislocations and upturnings of the layers of the rocks.”

Even more weird was the 1,348-foot-long Serpent Mound, which looked like an undulating snake atop a plateau overlooking Brush Creek.

Watts said he believes that the Indians saw the strange features in the land and were moved to build the mound, perhaps as a sacred monument. He said the Indians were deeply attuned to the natural world.

“It just begs the questions: Why would Native Americans lug tons of soil and shape it into a slithering serpent? Why would they choose to do so on the scar of an ancient impact when they had all of Ohio and the Midwest?” Watts said.

“My guess is that they could have noticed something strange about the rocks. It has to be more than coincidence.”

To reach these Plain Dealer reporters:

bsloat@plaind.com, 513-631-4125

Viva la Raposa Serra Del Sol!

Brazil authorises Indian reserve
By Tom Gibb
BBC News, Sao Paulo

President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has signed a decree creating an Amazonian Indian reserve the size of a small country in northern Brazil.

The reserve, Raposa Serra Do Sol, is called “the land of the fox and mountain of the sun” by the 12,000 Indians who live there.

Its hills, rivers and forests cover 17,000 sq km (6,500 square mies).

The move follows 30 years of campaigns by the Indians, which led to bitter conflicts with settlers and farmers.

During that time, human rights groups say at least a dozen Indians were killed in conflicts with miners and settlers.

Parts of the reserve, in the northern state of Roraima, are now planted with rice or grazed by cattle.

The decree for demarcation – the last step in a long process – has been sitting on the Brazilian president’s desk for a couple of years.

Whenever he has looked like signing, it has provoked fierce protests against the reserve from settlers and local politicians.

Justice Minister Tomas Bastos said that over the next year, farmers inside the reserve would be moved to alternative land.

Only roads, a frontier military base, and a small town inside the area have been excluded from the reserve.

Lula, as the president is known, will be hoping the decree will head off anti-government protests planned for next week by Indian groups.

They have been accusing him of not living up to promises over land.

The Karmic Kitchen

sfweekly.com | The Karmic Kitchen (Printable) | 2005-04-06

From sfweekly.com
Originally published by SF Weekly Apr 06, 2005
©2005 New Times, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Karmic Kitchen
Annalakshmi brings karmic dining to San Francisco; a convenience store groupie attends the “University of 7-Eleven.”
OVERHEARD BY JOHN MECKLIN

Imagine walking into an upscale Indian restaurant, its menu filled with delectable-sounding choices like Malabar avocado and coconut soup (made with plain yogurt, cumin, and lemon juice and served with fresh cilantro chutney and whole wheat chapatis) and drinks like the Saffron Sandalwood Fizz (lime juice and pure water, cooled overnight by the light of the moon). You sit down with friends and enjoy a delicious, ayurvedic vegetarian meal, served with a smile. Then you finish, feeling satisfied, and signal for the bill — but none comes. This scenario is not merely a fantasy: At Annalakshmi, you decide what to order and how much to pay.

Inspired by Swami Shantanand — a Hindu monk from Rishikesh, India, who came to Southeast Asia in the early 1970s — the small international restaurant chain operates with an uncommon trust in humanity: that people will pay what is fair because we are inherently good and because it is in our own best karmic interests to give. Although its concept may sound too idealistic to stand a chance, Annalakshmi has been in business for 19 years, and has thriving outposts in Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, and India. And now it’s geared up to open its first eatery in the United States — in an as-yet-undetermined spot in San Francisco.

Behind the scenes is a 35-year-old Marina District woman named Lalitha Vaidyanathan, who, late last year, quit her job as a co-founder and vice president at SquareTrade, a company that facilitates fair online sales, to pursue the restaurant’s local development full time. “I always felt like Annalakshmi has so much to offer people beyond just food,” she explains. “It really provides a whole new way of seeing the world and its possibilities. I felt that San Francisco would be a perfect place to open one. Why not? I figure if it’s meant to happen it will. I have complete trust in whatever’s meant to be.”

One of the reasons Annalakshmi — named after the Hindu concept of abundance — has succeeded is because it is run mostly by volunteers, called “Annalakshmis.” “People naturally want to volunteer because it allows them to tap into something divine within themselves,” says Vaidyanathan. “The human heart and its inherent generosity is the secret force behind Annalakshmi. There is nothing wrong with making money, but it’s also nice to give in a way that does not seek returns.”

Annalakshmi is actually part of a larger organization called the Temple of Fine Arts International, and is one of its main sources of revenue. TFA, also inspired by Swami Shantanand, exists to provide a variety of services such as pay-what-you-can dance and music courses, free medical clinics, and art galleries and handicrafts that direct proceeds to the artisans, bypassing any middlemen. TFA’s most recent event was an Indian cultural performance at New York’s Lincoln Center, put on without admission tickets.

So how does the restaurant do it? On a trip through Singapore with a friend recently, we stopped by to see for ourselves.

The Singapore outpost is ornate and beautiful, surrounded by exquisite handicrafts. Nearby are TFA’s gallery, medical clinic, and performing arts center. The eatery also has several smaller to-go outlets as well as a thriving catering business delivering lunches to businesses.

Ganesh Krishnan, its operations manager, says, “In any business, the goal is to have satisfied customers. That is our goal as well. When you have satisfied customers, they will return. That is the reason Annalakshmi is always full. Some people will pay less and some will pay more. The important thing is that they pay what they feel is right for them. In the end, it all balances out.”

When asked what happens if people take advantage of the system, Krishnan seems to imply that it’s not much of an issue. One customer, he says, came in and paid only a dime, to test the system. The next night he came in and paid only a dime again. The third night, the same. When he realized that there was no gimmick, he became a regular customer and increased his payments. For Krishnan, personal growth is part of the whole equation.

Another regular customer, who gives her name as Padmeeni, explains why she dines here instead of somewhere else: “I like to eat at Annalakshmi because the food is excellent and I feel good about where my money is going, through the various causes they support.” How much does she pay? The going rate, she says, if not a little more; it gives her a clear conscience.

After investigating Annalakshmi for a little while, we decided to volunteer — cutting vegetables — and it quickly became apparent that running a restaurant is an enormous undertaking for a largely unpaid crew. Still, when the eatery comes to San Francisco, we’ll be back in the kitchen, supporting a worldview built on abundance. (John Silliphant)

COURTESY JOSHUA BABCOCK!