02 JUNE
02: WHAT CHURCH IS FOR.

(above) This past unday,
Emmanuel Church, Greater of Manchester, England,
opened its doors to worshippers
and World Cup fans.
02 JUNE
02: WHAT CHURCH IS FOR.

(above) This past unday,
Emmanuel Church, Greater of Manchester, England,
opened its doors to worshippers
and World Cup fans.
01 JUNE 02: “If you are
a goalkeeper, maybe you put an elephant tooth in your boot to make you
big and strong.”
Magic of the Cup
Muti, marabouts, and
witch doctors – all bad for game’s image
Sunday February 10, 2002
A semi-final that featured
three shots hitting the woodwork, three red cards, a missed penalty, three
goals and several on-field punch-ups would normally have made all the headlines,
but not last Thursday.
All the
above happened in the first semi-final of the African Cup of Nations, when
Senegal surprised Nigeria by winning 2-1 in Bamako’s Stade Modibo Keita,
but the game was utterly overshadowed by events before kick-off a few miles
across town at the Stade du Mars 26, where Cameroon were preparing to take
on the host nation, Mali, in the second semi-final.
As Alassane
Diao was scuffing the winner seven minutes into extra-time for the Lions
of Senegal, the Cameroon coach, Winfried Schafer, and his assistant, Thomas
Nkono, found themselves being arrested by Malian police, ostensibly for
trying
to place a magic charm on the pitch before the game.
For the
Confederation of African Football, for whom this tournament is their global
showpiece, the incident could hardly have been more embarrassing. Schafer
– banned from the bench today for abusing a match commissioner – diplomatically
played down the incident, but CAF are desperate to throw off the Third
World image that they believe was a major factor in the decision not to
award South Africa the 2006 World Cup.
‘We are
no more willing to see witch doctors on the pitch than cannibals at the
concession stands,’ a CAF spokesman said. ‘Image is everything.’ But belief
in traditional religions still exists, nowhere more so than in Senegal,
where many attribute the rapid rise of French coach Bruno Metsu’s side
as much to the work of marabouts – the heads of local Islamic brotherhoods
who effectively act as intermediaries between believers and Allah – as
to their coach’s tactical nous.
Two years
ago in the Nations Cup quarter-final in Lagos, Senegal, having taken an
early lead, looked to be holding on when, 15 minutes from time, a former
official of the Nigerian FA raced on to the pitch and seized a ‘charm’
that had been lying in the back of the Senegal net. Senegal protested,
but to no avail, and Nigeria went on to score twice and win. The official
was subsequently banned, but his action was seen as hugely significant
in Nigeria’s progress. This time around, Senegalese journalists insist
they saw a marabout smearing goalkeeper Tony Sylva’s post with an ointment
ahead of the Lions’ 1-0 victory over Zambia in the group stages. Sylva
went 448 minutes without conceding a goal.
Freddie
Saddam is widely recognised as being South Africa’s most loyal fan and
his trip to Mali was financed by the South African FA. ‘I didn’t used to
think anything of muti [fetishism],’ he says, ‘but now I know it to be
true.’ He is in no doubt that the dearth of goals in Mali – 47 in 30 games
before yesterday’s third-place play-off – is down to the influence of the
witch doctors. ‘It is not normal,’ he says. ‘If you are a goalkeeper, maybe
you put an elephant tooth in your boot to make you big and strong. How
do you score past a man who is like an elephant?’
Elephant
teeth are readily available at the fetish market just south of the Stade
Modibo Keita, a bargain at 2000CFA a pop (£2). A monkey’s head costs
2,500CFA, a cayman’s head 7,500 and porcupine quills 5,000 a bundle. Last
August African Soccer magazine ran a 10-page investigation into witchcraft
in football, detailing animal sacrifices, self-mutilation, casting of spells,
lucky charms, odious concoctions and a one-hour delay at an international
match while teams argued about who would be first to step on to the pitch.
One South
African player recalls: ‘There was a time when things weren’t going well
for our team [one of the biggest in the country] and a director put us
all on a bus out into the bush. They cut the top off this big termite mound,
dug all the earth from inside and poured this muti mixture in. We all had
to bathe naked in it and walk back to the bus without walking backwards
at any time.’ Results improved. Mamadou, the fetishism store-owner in Bamako,
is unsure about what each item does, though he insists ‘many, many footballers’
go to his store.
‘I am
just the pharmacist, not the doctor,’ he says. Adama Dore, though, is an
expert. He is a magic-man from a village just outside Bamako, who deals
with 30-40 customers a week. His son, Aboubaka, is a promising youth player
for French side FC Paris – a rise, Dore insists, that has been much aided
by his magic.
Dore
also claims that France’s World Cup victory four years ago, far from resulting
from the defensive pairing of Marcel Desailly and Laurent Blanc, the skills
of Zinedine Zidane or the pace of Thierry Henry, was largely down to the
spells of Aguib Sosso, a Malian witch-doctor who died two years ago. Dore
and Saddam both feel it is unfair that the CAF should have decided to ban
the muti-men. ‘Will they ban Catholic players crossing themselves?’ Saddam
asks, spittle flying from the wide gap between his front teeth. ‘Will they
shut the chapel at Barcelona? If you believe, muti makes you stronger.’
The editor
of African Soccer, Emmanuel Maradas, says football only reflects the society
in which it exists. But it is embarrassing for the image of the game in
Africa, he believes, that so much time and money is devoted to witchcraft.
Whatever
they believe in, mental strength is something Senegal have in abundance,
as they proved in the semi-final when they put behind them the first-half
dismissal of Birahim Sarr to overcome Nigeria. El-Hadji Diouf, twisting,
turning and full of tricks, is their undoubted star, but he is aware of
just how important the team ethic is.
‘I know
that everyone in Senegal says El-Hadji Diouf is the star of Senegalese
football, but I don’t agree, because the real star is the group and the
solidarity within the group,’ says the Lens striker. That sense of unity,
born of the fact that nearly the entire squad are based in France, has
been carefully nurtured by Metsu, whose laissez-faire approach to discipline
has had its critics, but has, thus far, undeniably worked. His counterpart
this afternoon could hardly be more different.
Schafer
knows he was appointed largely to be as stereotypically German as he could
be. ‘I have never doubted the individual ability of my players, but when
I took over they lacked self-belief, tactical discipline and organisation,’
he explained. They have those qualities now. Cameroon in Mali have been
dull, muscular and brutally efficient. They are yet to concede a goal in
the tournament, are top-scorers with nine, and appear to be peaking at
the right time – if a little too reliant on the dead-ball skills and assists
of Real Madrid’s Geremi. Even without the injured Patrick Mboma, the Cup’s
joint top scorer with three goals, they turned in their best performance
in the competition in the semi-final. Mboma is fit again today.
Should
Cameroon repeat their triumph of two years ago they will become the first
side since Ghana in 1965 to retain the African Nations, a hiatus Schafer
sees as a challenge rather than a burden. ‘Cameroon have never before done
well as defending champions,’ he said. ‘They have never done well in a
World Cup year: this is simply another hurdle to overcome.’ Dore, though,
is backing Senegal. ‘I have seen that a West African side will win,’ he
says.
Schafer
overcame the riot police; it remains to be seen whether German single-mindedness
can overcome Dore’s metaphysics.
31 MAY 02: SOCCER
AND THE JUJU MEN


From LATimes:
Recipe for Victory: Hard Work and Pigeon
Blood
African soccer teams
rely on medicine men to ward off evil spirits and enemy shots, to the dismay
of some game administrators.
by DAVAN MAHARAJ, TIMES
STAFF WRITER
NAIROBI, Kenya — When the
four soccer teams from sub-Saharan Africa take the field for their World
Cup matches starting today, they will receive the usual support from coaches,
trainers and, in all likelihood, “team advisors” who are actually traditional
healers known as juju men.
The juju
men won’t be offering tips on game strategy. Their job will be to facilitate
a win by discreetly scattering charms on the field, putting hexes on opponents
and smearing their teams’ goalposts with magic potions to keep the ball
out.
Although
juju men are commonplace at African soccer matches, their presence–and
influence–has been such an embarrassment that the sport’s governing body
in Africa recently banned such “team advisors” from being part of a squad’s
official entourage.
“Image
is everything,” stated the Cairo-based Confederation of African Football
before the African Nations Cup in January in Mali. The group said it instituted
the ban to avoid presenting “a Third World image” during the continent’s
premier sporting event.
“We are
no more willing to see witch doctors on the [field] than cannibals at the
concession stands,” the CAF declared in a statement that caused juju men
from Senegal to South Africa to howl in protest.
“They
are throwing out the baby with the bathwater just because some soccer administrators
wish to appease the white man more than honor African culture,” one traditional
healer from Swaziland responded.
So far,
only the South African Football Assn. has announced that no traditional
healers would “officially” accompany its World Cup squad to Japan and South
Korea.
But soccer
commentators doubt that South Africa and the three other African countries–Nigeria,
Senegal and Cameroon–would leave their juju men home.
“To depart
for an international competition without consulting or including sorcerers
is akin to going to an exam without a pencil,” the authoritative African
Soccer magazine said in a recent issue.
The CAF
and, indeed, many Africans frown on juju, saying it has no role in modern
soccer. Since the CAF ban, columnists, soccer analysts and fans have been
debating in newspapers, Web sites and chat rooms about the efficacy of
juju and its history in African soccer.
Many
fans agree that for the teams to be successful, they need to combine skill
and rigorous training with soccer savvy. But those who discount soccer
sorcery do so at their own peril. Just ask the Elephants.
In 1992,
Ivory Coast, whose soccer team is nicknamed the Elephants, won the African
Nations Cup in a nail-biting penalty shootout against Ghana. Many Ivorians
credited the victory to a band of juju men enlisted by the sports minister
to give the national side an extra advantage.
When
the minister reneged on promises to pay the juju men, they promptly slapped
a hex on their national team. The result: a dismal 10-year slide for the
Elephants.
Only
last month, Defense Minister Moise Lida Kouassi went to the juju men’s
village to beg forgiveness and make amends.
“I’m
offering a bottle of liquor and the sum of” $2,000, he said, “so that the
village, through the perceptiveness of its wise men, will continue to help
the republic and, in particular, the minister of sport.” Africans are quick
to point out that players from Western nations practice their own form
of juju when they wear lucky charms, pray before an important match, cross
themselves after the national anthem or form a ritual huddle.
Even
basketball superstar Michael Jordan could be accused of practicing a little
juju for wearing his old University of North Carolina shorts under his
NBA uniform.
But in
Africa, there is little subtlety when it comes to superstitions.
In a
10-page special report, African Soccer magazine recently documented how
teams splatter pigeons’ blood around the dressing room to ward off evil
spirits, bury the remains of animals in their opponents’ half of the field,
and sacrifice cows, goats and other animals to collect blood for players
to bathe in.
Some
teams even slash their own players’ bodies with razor blades to rub a “magic
dust” into their bloodstream.
“I used
to get cut so much I was just like a ventilator,” a former South African
player said. “They used to cut us everywhere…. They would use the same
razor blade on everyone.”
Another
former Ivory Coast star recounted how at a previous African Nations Cup,
about 150 juju men set up camp in their hotel rooms, making players take
baths in large pots filled with various concoctions. Despite the elaborate
juju rituals, the Ivorians were kicked out in the first round, losing to
Egypt and Cameroon.
Defenders
of soccer sorcery say that juju men merely psych up players. They are no
different from the sport psychologists that many U.S. professional teams
maintain on their staff.
Jackson
Ambani claims to have motivated some of the best players in East Africa
during his 40-year career as a juju man.
The chalkboard
tacked up to the front door of his one-room shack in the sprawling Kangemi
slum outside Nairobi, Kenya’s capital, advertises Ambani’s day job as one
of the hundreds of thousands of faith healers throughout Africa. They use
herbs and prayer to ancestral spirits to cure malaria, gonorrhea, even
lovesickness.
During
the soccer season, Ambani is in high demand. The top soccer clubs in Kenya
and even coaches from the national team come calling, supplying Ambani
with the names of the opposing teams’ players.
This
week, the 74-year-old Ambani demonstrated how he puts the names in a small
terra-cotta urn, pours in the blood of chickens, goats and other animals,
and sprinkles in some of his special magic dust, which he keeps in a plastic
Skippy peanut butter container. After plugging the holes in the urn with
some goat horns, Ambani fires up the brew on a kerosene stove.
“When
I do this, even though the other team may have good players, they will
never perform well,” he said, breaking out in broad grin. “They will miss
the ball and see things that are not on the field. I am a spoiler.”
On some
occasions, Ambani slips into soccer stadiums at dawn to plant bones and
parts of animals at “essential places” in the field.
For his
services, Ambani charges from about $20 to as much as $2,000–depending
on the level of the game.
Ambani,
who said he wore No. 7 when he played for his village soccer team in western
Kenya, said he enjoyed working and talking sports with soccer players.
But since he purchased a cellular phone, his business has become a virtual
Dial-a-Juju. His clients now simply telephone in their order. When they
don’t pay, he reverses the hex on them.
Nicholas
Musonye, secretary-general of the Council of East and Central Africa Football
Assns., which runs soccer in 13 countries, said he has urged his members
to stay away from Ambani many times, to no avail.
Across
Africa, Musonye said, football associations use their sizable “research
budgets” to hire witch doctors and keep them happy. Musonye lamented that
the same groups pay their players small stipends and fail to correct their
poor diet or replace their ragged uniforms.
“Juju
doesn’t work,” Musonye said. “The road to success lies in hard work, hard
work and more hard work.”
He chuckled,
then said: “If juju worked, then African teams would win the World Cup
every four years, but that still hasn’t happened once.”
30 MAY 02: “AND LET THERE
BE CONSUMERS! MADE IN OUR OWN IMAGE!”

29 MAY 02: THE PRICE
OF HOME RUNS: SHRUNKEN GENITALIA, DISTORTED FACIAL FEATURES, HEART DAMAGE,
LETHARGY AND DEPRESSION, ETC.
Caminiti comes clean
Ex-MVP says he won award
while using steroids
Posted: Tuesday May 28,
2002 4:16 PM
ATLANTA (CNNSI.com) — Former
major leaguer Ken Caminiti says he was on steroids
when he won the National
League Most Valuable Player Award in 1996, according to
an exclusive report in this
week’s issue of Sports Illustrated.
But even though it left him
with health problems that continue to this day,
Caminiti defended his use
of steroids and told SI’s Tom Verducci the practice is
now so rampant in baseball
that he would not discourage others from doing the
same. Caminiti told Verducci
that he continued to use steroids for the rest of
his career, which ended
last season when he hit .228 with 15 home runs and 41
RBIs for the Texas Rangers
and the Atlanta Braves.
“Look at all the money in
the game,” Caminiti said. “A kid got $252 million. So
I can’t say, ‘Don’t do it,’
not when the guy next to you is as big as a house
and he’s going to take your
job and make the money.”
Eight days after his release
by the Braves last November, Caminiti was arrested
in a Houston crack house.
In March, he was placed on three years probation and
fined $2,000 after pleading
guilty to cocaine possession.
“I’ve made a ton of mistakes,”
admitted Caminiti, who is also a recovering
alcoholic. “I don’t think
using steroids is one of them.”
Although he is the first
major leaguer to publicly admit using steroids,
Caminiti told Verducci that,
“It’s no secret what’s going on in baseball. At
least half the guys are
using [steroids]. They talk about it. They joke about it
with each other. … I don’t
want to hurt fellow teammates or fellow friends.
But I’ve got nothing to
hide.”
Steroids are illegal in the
United States unless prescribed by a doctor for a
known medical condition.
But they are easily obtained, most commonly over the
counter at pharmacies in
Mexico and other Latin American countries. Former major
leaguer Chad Curtis, who
retired after last season, estimated that 40 to 50
percent of major league
ballplayers use steroids — sometimes supplemented with
joint-strengthening human
growth hormone — to suddenly become stronger and
faster.
“You
see guys whose facial features, jaw bones and cheek bones change past [age]
30.
Do they think that happens naturally?” Curtis told SI. “You go, ‘What
happened
to that guy?’ Then you’ll hear him say he worked out over the winter
and
put on 15 pounds of muscle. I’m sorry, working out is not going to change
your
facial features.”
Steroids improve muscle mass,
especially when combined with proper nutrition and
strength training. But they
also have several side effects, such as heart and
liver damage, endocrine-system
problems, elevated cholesterol levels, strokes,
aggressive behavior, and
the shrinkage and dysfunction of genitalia.
The NFL, NBA and International
Olympic Committee all test their athletes for
steroids. Major League Baseball
has no testing program, but in February owners
presented the players’ association
with a comprehensive drug-testing plan that
covers 17 commonly known
steroids, as well as amphetamines, cocaine, LSD and
Ecstasy.
“We need to test,” commissioner
Bud Selig told SI. “I believe it’s in the best
interest of the players
long term. I feel very strongly about that.”
But the players’ association
has refused to include steroid testing in past
collective bargaining agreements,
arguing that it is an invasion of privacy.
Gene Orza, the union’s associate
general counsel, was noncommittal about the
latest proposal.
“We’re going to do what the
interest of our membership requires us to do,” he
said. “There will be a consensus
from the players’ association.”
One reason for baseball’s
slow response, players suggested to SI, is that by
making players bigger —
the average All-Star weighed 211 pounds last year,
compared to 199 in 1991
— steroids have contributed to one of the greatest
slugging booms in the game’s
history. The single-season home run record has been
broken twice in four years,
while the 60-homer plateau has been surpassed six
times. Even leadoff hitters
and utility infielders are hitting home runs in
record numbers.
“We’re playing in an environment
in the last decade that’s tailored to produce
offensive numbers anyway,
with the smaller ballparks, the smaller strike zone,
and so forth,” said Arizona
Diamondbacks pitcher Curt Schilling. “When you add
in steroids and strength
training, you’re seeing records not just being broken,
but completely shattered.”
And
that’s what fans want, said Curtis. “If you polled the fans, I think they’d
tell
you, ‘I don’t care about illegal steroids. I’d rather see the guy hit the
ball
a mile or throw it 105 miles an hour.’ “
Caminiti told SI that he
began using steroids midway through the 1996 season
after injuring his shoulder
while playing third base for the San Diego Padres.
Then 33, Caminiti had never
hit more than 26 home runs in a season. But he hit
28 alone after the All-Star
break that year, finishing with 40 homers, 130 runs
batted in and a .326 batting
average. All were career highs, and he was a
unanimous choice for the
MVP.
“I think it was more of an
attitude,” Caminiti said of the steroids’ effect.
“There
is a mental edge that comes with the injections. And it’s definitely
something that gets you
more intense. The thing is, I didn’t do it to make me a
better player. I did it
because my body was broke down.”
While his performance improved,
Caminiti encountered new health problems,
primarily because he initially
used steroids nonstop instead of in recommended
cycles. As a result, his
testosterone level dropped 80 percent below normal.
Still, he continued to use
steroids for the rest of his career, albeit in proper
doses. But he never again
approached his ’96 performance, in part because he
spent portions of each of
his final five seasons on the disabled list.
“I got really strong, really
quick. I pulled a lot of muscles. I broke down a
lot,” he said. “I’m still
paying for it. My tendons and ligaments got all torn
up. My muscles got too strong
for my tendons and ligaments. And now my body’s
not producing testosterone.
You know what that’s like? You get lethargic. You
get depressed. It’s terrible.”
Caminiti’s injury history
is not unusual, according to the SI report. Major
league players made 467
trips to the DL last season, staying there an average of
59 days — 20 percent longer
than in 1997. And major league teams paid $317
million last year to players
physically unable to play — a 130 percent increase
from four years earlier.
“It [baseball] was always
the sport for the agile athlete with the small frame,”
said noted sports orthopedist
James Andrews of Birmingham, Ala. “Over these last
10 years, that’s all changed.
Now we’re getting a bunch of these muscle-related
injuries in baseball. You’d
have to attribute that — both the bulking up and
the increased injuries —
to steroids and supplements.”
28 MAY 02: EVIL CHRISTIANS
Anti-abortionists try
new weapon
Pro-life protestors
use cameras, raise legal Issues, lawsuits
By Yochi J. Dreazen
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
DENVER, May 28 As soon
as he saw the blue minivan turning into the parking lot
of Planned Parenthoods
small abortion clinic here, Kenneth Scott grabbed his
digital camera, clambered
up his rickety metal ladder and started snapping
pictures. Youll have nightmares
about this day the rest of your life, he
bellowed, photographing
the blond woman gingerly leaving the minivan. Then he
turned his camera to her
escort. Your sin wont be hidden or forgotten, he
screamed.
MR. SCOTT is doing his best to make sure of that. Within hours of his
photo expedition early this
month, he was home downloading the pictures onto his
computer so he could e-mail
them to Neal Horsley, a fellow activist in
Carrollton, Ga. Mr. Horsley
runs a Web site devoted to deterring homicidal
mothers from seeking abortions
by posting photos of women seen entering
abortion clinics. New pictures
he gets are often on the Web within days.
The site, Abortioncams.com, which Mr. Horsley claims gets almost two
million hits a month, marks
a tactical shift by the antiabortion movement.
Increasingly, protesters
are targeting women who seek abortions, not just
doctors who perform them.
The weapon of choice: the camera.
Shame enough women into realizing that eternal damnation awaits them if
they murder their baby and
the abortionists wont have any work to do, says Mr.
Scott, whose aging brown
van bears a small handwritten sign reading Smile!
Youre on Christiangallery.com!
(Its another Horsley Web site.)
Mr. Scott and his wife, Jo, are part of a loose-knit network of several
dozen activists from 24
states who send photos to Mr. Horsleys and a handful of
other Web sites. In Portland,
Ore., an affable man named Paul deParrie takes
photos of women entering
clinics for Mr. Horsley as well as for his own
antiabortion site, Portlandporcupine.com.
Mr. Horsley hopes to have contributing
photographers in every state
by the end of the year. He also says he hopes to
start adding the womens
names and addresses. Some postings already show
license-plate numbers.
The tactic poses difficult legal questions that courts are just beginning
to tackle. Last year, an
Illinois woman whose photo and medical records were
posted online sued the activists
who took the photo and the man who ran the Web
site, a friend of Mr. Horsleys.
Her pending damage suit says the posting
violated her privacy and
subjected her to humiliation and potential harm.
A right to privacy doesnt appear in the Constitution or the Bill of
Rights, but for the past
37 years, courts have increasingly held that Americans
have a right to keep many
details of their lives secret. Among issues the courts
could someday have to weigh
with regard to this tactic is whether women going in
for abortions lose any of
this protection because theyre in a public place-or,
to the contrary, whether
entering a clinic for a medical procedure affords
additional privacy protection.
Courts may have to consider whether the Web sites
implicitly threaten violence
against the women. And theyll certainly have to
weigh the claim of the activists
that they are journalists whose work is
protected by the First Amendment
right to free speech.
This is a new area for the law, and theres no easy answer based on past
cases that makes this a
slam dunk in either direction, says Jonathan Zittrain,
co-director of Harvard Law
Schools Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
In Denver, a Planned Parenthood clinic set in a low-slung gray building
in a poor residential area
is the site of a strange game of cat and mouse. When
protesters first began carrying
still and video cameras here last summer, clinic
employees strung tall gray
curtains alongside the parking lot to block the view
from the sidewalk. The protesters
brought in ladders. Then Planned Parenthoods
volunteer escorts began
carrying huge umbrellas to try to shield the womens
faces.
Stan Roebuck, Planned Parenthoods security director for the Colorado
region, says the presence
of the cameras ratchets up the tension for women who
are already under extreme
stress. To Kate Michelman, president of the National
Abortion and Reproductive
Rights Action League, This is like drawing a
bulls-eye on the backs
of these women and inviting those who are irrationally
zealous to take action.
The activists say theyre doing nothing to incite or
threaten violence.
One California mother of two says she was shocked when she was told by
a
friend that her photo was
on Mr. Horsleys site. Getting an abortion was the
most difficult and personal
decision Ive ever had to make, says the woman,
requesting anonymity because
she doesnt want friends and family to know she had
one. I couldnt believe
that some stranger had the nerve to share it with the
world.
FIGHTING BACK
One woman is fighting back in court. She suffered a cervical tear while
a
patient at the Hope Clinic
in Granite City, Ill., and needed to be rushed to a
hospital. As clinic staffers
wheeled her toward a waiting minivan, one of a
group of antiabortion protesters
outside, Daniel Michael of nearby Highland,
Ill., saw what was happening
and snapped a picture of her. Within days, her
picture as well as her medical
records-obtained through an unknown source-were
on a Web site called Missionaries
to the Unborn. It didnt name her but included
her age, the name of her
tiny hometown, the fact that she was married and the
age and sex of her only
child.
Identified as Jane Doe in court papers, the woman alleges the photo
and records revealed her
identity, violating her privacy and opening her to
potential public humiliation
and physical violence. She said in a deposition in
state court in Edwardsville.,
Ill., that she feared an extremist could try to
track her down and harm
her. She declined to comment for this article.
The defendants include Mr. Michael, his wife, Angela, and Stephen Wetzel,
who runs the Web site. The
suit also names the hospital, recently renamed
Gateway Medical Center,
for failing to make sure her records stayed
confidential. Mr. Michael
and Mr. Wetzel say the records came to them
anonymously.
The woman is seeking more than $400,000, mostly in punitive damages.
State court judge George
Moran issued a temporary restraining order last summer
ordering removal of her
photo and medical records from Missionaries to the
Unborn and another Web site.
The case is pending.
Mr. Wetzel says the woman has no reason to fear for her safety. Nobodys
going to go after a girl
for getting an abortion, he says. Theyre as much a
victim as the babies are.
Mr. Michael says the medical records shouldnt have
been put online. He says
the woman has a right to privacy but adds that it
wasnt violated because
the photos were blurry and the records were redacted to
exclude her name and address.
This wasnt meant to harm her it was just to
let the world know what
happens at that clinic, he says. The hospital didnt
return a call seeking comment.
One tough legal question likely to arise as these tactics continue is
whether posting womens
photos on a site such as Mr. Horsleys which likens
abortion to murder and speaks
of divine punishment for patients and their
doctors amounts to a threat
against their safety. A person making such a claim
could have a high bar to
clear. Courts have generally found that plaintiffs
alleging threats to their
safety must show the defendant directly threatened to
do violence against them.
In a 1982 Supreme Court case, NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware, black
activists working to enforce
a civil-rights boycott against several white-owned
businesses in Mississippi
stood outside and wrote down the names of blacks who
continued to shop there.
The names were read aloud at a public meeting and
published in a newspaper,
leading to several assaults and arsons. Later, an
organizer was quoted as
saying that if he caught anyone going in any of them
racist stores, were gonna
break your damn neck. The high court said the
statement was constitutionally
protected because there was no evidence the
organizer had authorized
a specific act of violence or threatened to commit one
himself.
Mr. Zittrain and other legal experts say that current privacy laws dont
appear to protect a person
from being photographed while in a public place, but
that women could potentially
sue the photographers or the sites for intentional
infliction of emotional
stress or illegal intimidation.
A SUIT IN OREGON
The women could benefit from a recent appellate-court decision that
touched on another Web site
Mr. Horsley runs, Nuremberg Files, which carries
abortion providers names,
addresses and photos and crosses out their names when
theyve been killed. It
was cited in a lawsuit against others-a group called the
American Coalition of Life
Activists-as evidence of intimidation.
Planned Parenthood, several doctors and a clinic in Portland, Ore., filed
the suit in federal court
in Portland. It alleged the Coalition had incited
violence and broken a 1994
federal law that allows doctors and clinic workers to
sue antiabortion protesters
they believe have tried to intimidate them into no
longer doing the procedure.
In 1999, a jury awarded the plaintiffs nearly $107 million, virtually all
punitive damages. Two years
later, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the 9th Circuit
in San Francisco overturned the verdict, saying that
though the site and some
of the groups posters used inflammatory language and
imagery, they didnt contain
any explicit threats of physical harm to an
individual.
But this month the full 9th Circuit reversed that decision and said that
the activists had made
statements to intimidate the physicians, reasonably
foreseeing that physicians
would interpret the statements as a serious
expression of … intent
to harm them. The court said the doctors had begun
wearing bulletproof vests
as a direct result of the posters and Web site, and
concluded the protesters
activities amounted to a true threat and not
protected speech. The activists
promise to appeal, and many observers expect
the Supreme Court to take
the case because of the thorny questions of free
speech and abortion access
it raises.
Mr. Scott, the picture-taking end of the Scott-Horsley operation, says
he
had a personal experience
with abortion 23 ago, when he got a girlfriend
pregnant and paid for her
to have an abortion. Later he married, and he says
that after his second marriage
fell apart he became a born-again Christian. Now
he spends much of his free
time protesting at abortion clinics across the
country. He met his third
wife, Jo, at an antiabortion protest near the 1996
Republican convention in
San Diego.
The two, devout Grace Christians, play the part of bad cop and good cop;
Mr. Scott screams at the
women about hell and damnation, while Mrs. Scott
quietly approaches cars
pulling into the clinic to offer women ultrasound tests,
financial help or advice
about adoption.
One afternoon earlier this month in Denver, Mr. Scott yelled at a woman
in a green jacket hurriedly
walking toward the clinic doors with a tall man in a
red T-shirt. Dont kill
your baby, he said. Youll always wonder if it was a
boy or a girl.
His words had the desired effect: The man turned to swear at Mr. Scott
and raised his middle finger,
while the woman pivoted to see what the commotion
was. Mr. Scott, wearing
a placard around his neck reading Life begins at
conception and ends at Planned
Parenthood, quickly took several photos.
By the end of the day, he had snapped more than 90 pictures in all, the
scenes ranging from the
confrontational to the prosaic. In one photo, a woman in
a green jacket was running
toward the facility while her male companion, a tall
man with a pony tail and
goatee, raised his fist at the camera. In another, two
women stepped out of a parked
car. The womens faces were all clearly visible.
At home in a suburb of Boulder, Colo., Ms. Scott hooked the camera to a
desktop computer in her
basement and transferred the photos to an online
picture-sharing service
called Ofoto. Minutes later, they were on their way to
Mr. Horsley in Georgia.
There, in a home office cluttered with tripods, guitars,
an overflowing bookcase
and photos of his college-age children, Mr. Horsley soon
began downloading the photos
into a computer.
Getting them online takes time. The first step is choosing, sometimes
from as many as 500 pictures
sent him in a week, he says. Mr. Horsley says he is
a journalist trying to tell
a story, and wants to avoid using pictures with
poses or expressions too
similar to others he has posted on the site. He also
resizes the photos and edits
their color and lighting, though he says the
Scotts photos rarely need
much retouching. Theyre pros, he says.
From my point of view, Mr. Horsley says, this is a news report that
has the ability to send
a message. I want images that capture the look on a
womans face as she goes
to a place where babies are being killed.
After picking the photos, the final step is to make duplicate versions
of
each photo, including a
miniature that will appear on a Web page full of other
shots from each state and
a full-size image that viewers can access by clicking
on the small one. The whole
process takes about 15 minutes per picture.
Maintaining the site costs about $10,000 a year. Mr. Horsley pays for
much of it through his day
job as a computer and Internet consultant. He also
gets donations from other
antiabortion activists. He tries to update the site
every day, and says hes
always looking for new photographers. Get out there to
your local butchertorium
with your zoom lenses and get those cameras rolling,
he writes on his Web site.
Point and click.
26 MAY 02: IT’S COSMIC
BACKGROUND, BROTHER!

This Cosmic Background Imager
picture reveals faint microwave radiation from the
farthest reaches of the
universe. The colors depict different radiation
intensities, with reds showing
cooler areas and the light colors showing hotter
ones.
Image could show cosmos
at 300,000 years old
May 23, 2002 Posted: 12:56
PM EDT (1656 GMT)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) — New
images of the early universe — a time before there
were galaxies, stars or
planets — show the cosmic ripples that eventually
became every bit of matter
and energy, scientists reported on Thursday.
The pictures,
made by a scientific instrument called the Cosmic Background
Imager on a remote plateau
in Chile, are the most detailed images of the oldest
light ever emitted, the
researchers said in a statement.
The light
the Imager captured is from perhaps 300,000 years after the
theoretical Big Bang explosion
that many scientists believe marked the start of
the universe.
The Imager
detected tiny variations in the cosmic microwave background, the
radiation that has traveled
to Earth over almost 14 billion years, according to
the U.S. National Science
Foundation, which funded the research along with the
California Institute of
Technology.
The images
make the cosmic background radiation look like a blurred flame, but
they actually are the first
seeds of matter and energy that later evolved into
clusters of hundreds of
galaxies.
“We have
seen, for the first time, the seeds that gave rise to clusters of
galaxies, thus putting theories
of galaxy formation on a firm observational
footing,” said Caltech scientist
Anthony Readhead.
Measurements
taken by the instrument add to evidence supporting the notion of
cosmic inflation, a period
of furious expansion instants after the Big Bang.
These
findings may also help scientists learn more about “dark energy,” a
mysterious repulsive force
that seems to defy gravity and pushes the universe to
expand at an ever-quickening
rate.
24 MAY 02: EX-ANARCTICA
FROM MSNBC.COM/Reuters:

This image taken March 18
by the ENVISAT satellite shows the retreat of the Larsen B ice shelf for
the decade.
SYDNEY, May 23 Sophisticated
satellite imaging equipment launched into space two months ago is beaming
back ultra-sharp pictures of the greatest breakup of Antarctic ice in modern
times, say Australian scientists. Technology in the European observation
satellite ENVISAT, launched on March 1 from French Guyana in South America,
is taking pictures from 800 km (500 miles) in space in sufficient detail
to clearly show objects no bigger than a suburban house.