"Modern man keeps wanting to graduate, but they graduate in the areas that seem to be so solitary instead of the kind areas, like dolphins graduating across the horizon into the sun. "

A Study of Captain Beefheart

This interview was conducted by Patrick Carr and was taken from the 19th March 1972 edition of Crawdaddy

“New York is a slow turtle with diarrhea” says Captain Beefheart, alias the Spotlight Kid, alias Don Van Vliet.

The Anderson Theatre is in that area of New York now known as the Lower East Side. Once it was called The Last Village, when Flower Power sowed its stone fields with the waifs and strays and prophets of the New America. Even if it is no longer a cool ‘n groovy place to live, let alone hang out on a Saturday night, some Junior Entrepreneurs chose the Anderson for the scene of Captain Beefheart’s recent sell-out concert.

Perhaps a Winter evening of freaky follies amid the wizened ghosts of Last Village freakdom in such a classic (vintage) setting was not the optimum opportunity for trite appreciation of Captain Beefheart, Spirit Child of the earth: whatever, it could not have been more suited for the exposure of the Spotlight Kid.

The Spotlight Kid has emerged from the cocoon of Captain Beefheart’s inner world, simply, that means that the Good Captain has finally decided that he wants to be heard and seen by his fellow humans, some of whom may easily have been alienated by the much-publicised weirdo mystique which has grown up around the man. Beefheart has taken tentative steps towards those people with his new album.

“No, it’s not a compromise,” he says from the cushioned depths of a Warner Brothers armchair, “I got tired of scaring people with what I was doing. I mean, people were backing away. I realised that I had to give them something to hang their hat on, so I started working more of a beat into the music. It’s more human that way. You know I wrote 400 songs for this album?”

Be not misled, though. The Spotlight Kid, compositions from which were performed at the Anderson, is about as far away from humdrum old rock and roll as Eureka, California, is from East 50th Street on Manhattan Island, the scene of my last meeting with Captain Beefheart. Like anything the man turns his hand to, his latest album is, er… something else – the creative product of a truly unique artist and four of the most ‘advanced’ musicians currently occupied with the pursuit of musical communication. Beefheart’s music is Earth music, but not in the sense that term is most often used to apply to any gutsy basic form of rock and blues. Beefheart’s music includes the animals, the sky, the sea, the plants, and all else that conspired to form his extraordinary vision.

As the most commercial of his many albums, The Spotlight Kid may just get the word around. What is the word? Well, that may take some time to explain in little mechanical words drummed out from under several thousand tons of masonry here in Necropolis, 1972, Chinese Year of the Rat.

Almost exactly one year ago I walked into a Holiday Inn motel room and met the man whose reputation had prepared me for an interview of the strangest sort; the word was out that the Good Captain was endowed with Powers of which your average journalist has little experience. My ridiculous paranoia was allayed within minutes: Beefheart was kind, open for ideas and willing to reveal his own. Over the course of four meetings, he treated me as a friend and ally. In short; Beefheart is a good man.

Briefly, Don Van Vliet was born in 1941 in Glendale, California. From an early age, he rejected the moulds and false promises of American culture, preferring to learn the world in his own way by recreating the range of nature’s creatures in clay. Likewise, he refused to restrict his imagination to the conventional boundaries of the English language. His parents, fearing they had produced some kind of freak (and they had) took him away to the desert, away from the influence of “corrupt” artistic acquaintances (like the painter who introduced him and his art to TV audiences).

“I’ve seen man’s heart in a large filing cabinet,” the Captain remembers. ”I’ve seen the smile of the Buick Riviera. Modern man keeps wanting to graduate, but they graduate in the areas that seem to be so solitary instead of the kind areas, like dolphins graduating across the horizon into the sun. Man graduates with no sand and sun and water. I think more children should play with mudpies, but that’s out now.”

Beefheart had committed himself to graduation in the kind areas already, though, so his parents’ ploy was not successful. In Lancaster, California, he began to listen to and play with music, developing a taste for Delta blues and the jazz of Coltrane, Ornette Coleman, and other ‘kind’ beings. He met and befriended Frank Zappa in Lancaster, and after a brief stint at art college and various unsatisfactory forms of paid employment, he moved to Cucamonga to begin a professional association with Zappa which at that time produced no tangible results. When Zappa formed the Mothers, Beefheart assembled his first Magic Band, and proceeded to wow the natives as very few performers had ever done; in 1964, the Magic Band was, to say the least, unusual. Playing a revolutionary blend of Delta, rock, and jazz, all worked into Beefheart’s incredible 5 and a half octive vocal range and performed in all-black leather outfits to the accompaniment of the Captain’s humorous worldly / other-worldly wisdom, they soon attracted the attentions of record company talent scouts. And thus did Beefheart’s career in the Music Biz begin. This saga reads like the story of a Good Martian trying to make it in the garment district; never quite sure of how he got there or why he stayed. Alice in Blunderland.

“I could have made it many times” says Beefheart, “but I had to make my creative contribution, you know?”

They wanted him to play the blues and wipe the floor with all the competition – not an unrealistic hope if it weren’t for Beefheart’s refusal to pander to popular taste in the creation of his own magic. His progress was unsteady, halted by periods of complete withdrawal from the public world, vastly complex matters of business entailing contracts, tampering with his recorded material, personal disputes with manager / friends – all culminating in a string of broken trusts, and bad feelings which thoroughly alienated him from all dealings with beings who were “too far out,” too far removed from the natural functions of man.

The story of those confusing alliances (some of them doubtless not exactly helped by Beefheart’s acute sensitivity) has been told before where it reached a large audience; hence my inclination to avoid the subject even at the expense of the reader’s natural curiosity. Such stories are by no means uncommon in the world of music and its communication, as anyone who has ever talked to a musician will know. Only the names and places change, and it’s a sordid, painful subject. When I first talked to Beefheart, he was happy with his personal manager, one Grant Gibbs. Since then things have changed. “That man was just too hip,” Beefheart says, and leaves it at that. Now he has a new manager with whom he seems well pleased; a general impression of satisfaction with that end of his life is conveyed. Up in the Warner Brothers relaxation suite, a mood of easygoing friendship prevailed between the artist and his commercial associates.

At last he has complete artistic control over the whole process, from frantic bursts of initial inspiration to vinyl in the store window. Characteristically, he maintains that should that arrangement ever change, Warner Brothers will have to follow his dust. About the relationship between record company and artist, he is cautiously optimistic.

”I think they should make their corners a little more rounded and softer on the machine. If they could just make it a little easier – pay the artists and not make the artist feel like he’s someone pushing a broom that’s connected to an IBM that sends him out to the people through ratholes or something like that – I think then it would be a lot nicer. I think Warner Brothers are beginning to do that. So far everything has been real nice.”

And now Captain Beefheart has joined the ranks of performing musicians. The Spotlight Kid is loose.

“At this time I’m around people that I can look straight across at,” the Captain smiles. “Before I had to walk up into tall buildings to say hello to these people, and I had to walk down into the subterranean areas to look at these people, talk to them. Now it’s a little different.”

Also Beefheart the Freak-from-nobody-knows-where-or-when, he says that it is all a hoax perpetrated by Zappa and others for publicity purposes; such humility is touching, but despite the fact that my personal impressions of him were distinctly wordly, I would hesitate to hang a name like Normal Don on him. He is, above all, the embodiment of a creative force which simply discards all non-essential non-living ‘functional’ impediments to the flow of creative energy locked into this world. And that’s what I mean by ‘wordly.’

”It upsets me that they’re using me as a grandaddy clock or something, that they can walk by and go, ‘well, I’m all right as long as I’m weird.’ I would say that they’re pretty far out. I would say that they’re tacking things onto themselves, using themselves as a walking bulletin board of distortion. Maybe they should try not looking in a mirror for a month or so.

”I’m sure it will soon fade. Just like the breath on a mirror, I’m sure that the past will fade and leave a nice rainbow or something.”

Yes, the Spotlight kid does know when another human is trying to contact him. Yes, by telephone too.

Yes, the Spotlight Kid did engage a tree doctor to examine his trees after exposure to the din of recording in his house.

Yes, the Spotlight Kid did shatter a $1,200 recording microphone with his astounding voice, and that was just one instance of Beefheart transcending the machines. “The condition of the art is, er, really poor” he concludes.

Yes, the Spotlight Kid maintains to this day that he has never read a book. “I get people to read things to me sometimes. I have enough trouble getting out what’s in me already without having to consider what other people are saying. Besides, I can’t concentrate on print, I need one of those kid’s books with huge letters.”

Yes, he does have literally thousands of unpublished poems in storage, and to date he has written five unpublished novels, ”if you want to call them by that name”.

No, he is not a reincarnation of one of Rembrandt’s ace pupils, though that would hardly be surprising, given his skill with a brush, etc. He is, by his own admission one month ago in New York City, a descendant of one of Rembrandt’s pupils, ace or not. “He was the one who was a fuck-off, like me,” admits the artist with touching modesty, drawing on a Balkanr Sobranie cigarette, the only kind he really likes these days. “Americans can’t make good cigarettes” he declares.

So much for the legend. There remains the man and his thought and his art.

Beefheart is a large man, 30 years old and round all over, topped by a hat over the brain and bottomed by a pair of big feet on the round earth.

“They can catch a straight line,” he says, referring to microphones, deadheads, and the like, “but they can’t catch a circle. I don’t work in straight lines.”

He talks slowly, deeply resonating words that are almost music in themselves, poetry in their co-operation with each other; sometimes the rumble booms down below the limits of a plastic tape made somewhere in Japan, and I lose them to the machine. I never once heard him raise his voice or talk anything like fast, and he doesn’t need to because his charisma wins attention; it doesn’t demand it. He has a Dutch face like you can see staring open and solid into the painter’s brush. Peter Van Vliet would acknowledge his family ties with no second thought.

He has lost weight recently, never having attained truly heroic proportions. He’d love to be a balloon, but that’s life. He likes Joe Namath because he really can do what he claims; he has no particular admiration for the Grateful Dead because what they are doing is “so old,” and he doesn’t like “their calling card.” He considers Ornette Coleman to be the fountainhead of prime creativity in American music; the mention of his name and that of Van Gogh begins a revealing monologue.

“I think Van Gogh almost improved the natural sunshine. He got into alchemy, he got into feeling his feet on the ground and feeling the colours up from the ground and the metals and the salts and everything to such a degree that he was able to exude the ground he walked on into canvas, into paint – which I think is what an artist can do and should do. That’s what I’m trying to do, y’know. I’m trying to do in this day and age the same thing that he did; not the same thing, though.

“There’s one waterhole. There’s one drop of water which makes up the ocean. And I’m just one of those drops of water, I would like to colour that drop of water out and just let it break into the sunset.

“I know that Ornette Coleman feels the same way about that; I’m not trying to put my name beside Ornette Coleman, because you can’t put your name beside Ornette Coleman. I think he is one person who has done that. I just wish that people could drink water with him. I think he’s one of the greatest artists today.”

“I wish that they’d let him out of that trap that they’ve made for him. He never wanted that; he was ahead way long ago – he wasn’t ahead, he was right with himself, you know? People try to make you go ahead and try to make you go back, and whenever you play, whenever I play the horn, I hope that people don’t try to tell me how to play that horn. Because the minute they try to make me go back or go forward on that horn, I’ll stick that horn into a mushroom and let it grow in a mushroom, and I’ll be out painting with a brush.

“I’ve watched what they’ve tried to do to him, and I tell ya, I don’t like it. I don’t think they’re trying to do the same thing to me because I’m a white boy, you see – which is ridiculous because everybody’s coloured or you wouldn’t be able to see them. I mean, really, I don’t feel that I’m any colour, and he doesn’t either. He just wants to play.

“I wish my audience would listen to him, and just go on to become greater and greater.

“There’s thousands of people blowing rainbows out of their horns and rainbows off their finger, and seeking to bring the light to those who need to hide their shadow. There’s thousands who never get heard because they just don’t have the energy to fight off that machine. I think that everybody has to do all they can do to improve themselves, not to deteriorate themselves with speed and things to emulate the fast society. The society should slow down, it’s so fast and bulbous. There can’t be a continuous tumescence like that.”

He pauses to send Zoot Horn Rollo (glass finger and appendage steel guitarist of the Magic Band) out into the metal winds to look for artists’ materials. Zoot does not return. More of him and his colleagues anon.

”Why don’t they realise and start doing nice things? Where are the animals, man? Why are there no animals in this programme? Do the children get to see the animals? Do they allow people to look into the eyes of another animal that can’t reason, but is on the natch and doing real nice – even with all these horrible, horrible onslaughts?”

Beefheart sees the mountains being covered over with mayonnaise. He sees the gigantic buildings blocking out the sun throbbing with pointless life (death). “I don’t believe in insanity,” he says, “I believe in varying degrees of disconnection.

“The bee takes the honey and he sets the flower free. Man takes the honey and he gets stuck in it. Men get so intelligent that they’re stupid. Man is a child that can’t accept his natural functions.”

Beefheart is an artist – a painter, a musician, a poet. See his paintings on his album covers, hear his music and his poetry when he makes it in a recording booth or on a stage – preferably the latter, if like me you have trouble hearing his magic on vinyl. Alive in person, he and the Magic Band are light-years closer to you. Beefheart is conscious of the problem (not quite so apparent on The Spotlight Kid as it was on Safe As Milk, Strictly Personal, Lick My Decals Off, Baby or Trout Mask Replica), but thereÔø?s little he can do about it.

His current Magic Band has been together now for almost two years, and he is more than pleased with them. Beefheart’s music cannot be played by any old musician; it takes a breaking down of conventional musical theory and practise, a smashing of structures and a willingness to PLAY.

Hence, he renamed the people he found for his band when they came to him – he found Zoot Horn Rollo at a ballroom in California. “I looked down and saw this wide young face staring into my eyes. They’re not interested in having their surnames, see, because of the fact that they’re attached to all those nests their folks tried to keep them in. We have to get away from the nest.”

Beefheart writes all their material, letting it flow out through his voice onto the piano and onto the tape, to be taught to the band. They help too, of course, more now than a year ago; between them and himself there exists a total relationship which seems to be almost wordless. “I’ve watched their walk, I’ve watched their talk – and not just watching. It’s more like I’ve been a sponge and soaked up all their water. They were pretty contaminated when I first found them; they’d been listening to radio…”

Ed Marimba plays drums, marimba, piano and harpsicord. Winged Eel Fingerling plays guitar. Rockette Morton plays Bassus Ophelius. Zoot Horn Rollo plays glass finger and steel appendage guitar. Beefheart himself plays tenor and soprano sax, bass clarinet, and anything else that comes to mind. Onstage, they are a visual delight: Rockette Morton, looking like a reincarnation of Beaudelaire, Toulouse-Lautrec and Gene Vincent all rolled into one, jerks the most astounding dance to the thrashing of his bass that you are ever likely to see. His playing is certainly the best of any bass-player I have ever seen, and Charlie Mingus is likewise impressed. Zoot Horn Rollo and Winged Feel Fingerling sway in unison, and blend two beautiful flowing fluid guitars. Ed Marimba, monacle and yachting cap secure from the rhythms of his drums, blows out the patterns of the skins. Beefheart stands and paces, watching like a benevolent giant until he moves up to the microphone to howl and screech and moan and rasp any one of a thousand voices from the Mississippi delta to the farther reaches of the Cosmos, or play chaotic rainbows from his horns.

I cannot describe their music, just as I cannot tell you how Beefheart plays with the words in his head (except by saying that he does play with words, turning the boundaries of semantics into starting-points for the surreal expansion of meaning). Beefheart tries to paint the clouds in music; he comes in colours.

Beefheart seems to have found some peace with his surroundings. He lives with his gentle wife, Jan, in a house which offers a panorama of ocean and redwoods outside of Eureka, northern California, up by the Oregon, border. The local fishermen bring fish up to the house for his family table, and when he dons a suit, just for, the hell of it, they take that as a sign of strangeness. With such a solid basis for his art and a happy gaining of self-confidence, Beefheart may be ripe to overcome the obstacles to popularity which have previously hampered his acceptance by the people he wants to play with.

The magic is in you
The magic is around you
Play with it
Play with yourself
Love the earth
Find the way away from the heartbeat
Remember that mirrors are black magic
Imagine
And listen to Captain Beefheart

“I’m not riding in a stagecoach and reaching out to shake hands with the Indians. Maybe I’ve lost the ability to wear an Indian hat.”

Patrick Carr, 1972

"Augmented Reality" in Basel


Beyond virtual reality

By David Reid
Reporter, BBC Click Online

One step on from virtual reality, augmented reality takes the real world and digitally distorts and transforms what we see around us. David Reid takes a trip to the Swiss City of Basel to experience it.

But there is a potential new feature on the sightseeing map, which could help tourists better explore the town.

LifeClipper, a project created by new media organisation Plug.In, gives artists the digital tools to prise open the doors of perception.

The augmented reality system is entirely put together with off-the-shelf components.

A head-mounted camera, for instance, acts as the eyes.

As the subject makes his or her way around the tour, global positioning satellites help trigger visual high-jinks in the rucksack computer according to whichever zone the subject has wandered into.

Nikki Neecke, a sound-designer and musician for LifeClipper, says: “We have developed different scenes of picture sets and music, and we use the GPS to determine where we are in the street.

“So if I go to the border of the Rhine it is different from when I go to the church, and that’s done using GPS.”

It sounds straightforward enough. So I decided to give it a go.

The first difficulty was simply getting used to a robot’s eye-view of the world, with low resolution and cramped field of view.

It is very, very difficult to walk with the apparatus on because there is a very slight delay between your actions and what you see through your eyes.

When I walked past a paper mill I could see the inner workings, and hear the sound of the mechanics thumping in my ears.

In 1943 Doctor Albert Hoffman invented LSD in Basel, and there is an amazing section of the tour that plunges the user into full-blown psychedelia.

However, a slight shift in reality is often more powerful than a massive one.

Jan Torpus, new media artist for LifeClipper, says: “We are not trying to develop a new technology here.

“We are trying to find a language for this new technology. That’s an important part.”

Plug.In’s Annette Schindler adds: “It kind of materialises our imagination, something that happens in our head, also without the head-set and the computer on our back.”

Seeing may be believing, but turn the world on its head and there is only so much we will find convincing.

By making subtle changes to what we see, augmented reality often goes one better than virtual reality.

And when it comes to playing tricks with our senses, the devil is often in the detail, as Jan Torpus explains.

“It has been said pretty often that the little changes – which make you think: ‘what was that? Was it real or not?’ – are much stronger than if you make an MTV show out of it.”

The creators of LifeClipper see it more as an open-air art project than a new technology.

Many who have done the tour say it is like living a movie.

Jan and Nikki, however, are not so interested in Hollywood-style rags-to-riches and commercially exploiting their system.

They would prefer to take their equipment to other venues and develop new dimensions to their walking experience.

Pinchbeck was right.

CNN.com – E-mails†’hurt IQ more than pot’ – Apr 22, 2005
Friday, April 22, 2005 Posted: 8:08 AM EDT (1208 GMT)
LONDON, England — Workers distracted by phone calls, e-mails and text messages suffer a greater loss of IQ than a person smoking marijuana, a British study shows.

The constant interruptions reduce productivity and leave people feeling tired and lethargic, according to a survey carried out by TNS Research and commissioned by Hewlett Packard.

The survey of 1,100 Britons showed:

Almost two out three people check their electronic messages out of office hours and when on holiday

Half of all workers respond to an e-mail within 60 minutes of receiving one

One in five will break off from a business or social engagement to respond to a message.

Nine out of 10 people thought colleagues who answered messages during face-to-face meetings were rude, while three out of 10 believed it was not only acceptable, but a sign of diligence and efficiency.

But the mental impact of trying to balance a steady inflow of messages with getting on with normal work took its toll, the UK’s Press Association reported.

In 80 clinical trials, Dr. Glenn Wilson, a psychiatrist at King’s College London University, monitored the IQ of workers throughout the day.

He found the IQ of those who tried to juggle messages and work fell by 10 points — the equivalent to missing a whole night’s sleep and more than double the 4-point fall seen after smoking marijuana.

“This is a very real and widespread phenomenon,” Wilson said. “We have found that this obsession with looking at messages, if unchecked, will damage a worker’s performance by reducing their mental sharpness.

“Companies should encourage a more balanced and appropriate way of working.”

Wilson said the IQ drop was even more significant in the men who took part in the tests.

“The research suggests that we are in danger of being caught up in a 24-hour ‘always on’ society,” said David Smith of Hewlett Packard.

“This is more worrying when you consider the potential impairment on performance and concentration for workers, and the consequent impact on businesses.”

Rudkin on Vampyr

Vampyr
Vampyr
David Rudkin
Paperback: £8.99

Vampyr Der Traum des Allan Gray (1932) is one of the founding and defining works of psychological horror cinema, adapted from Gothic stories by Sheridan Le Fanu, a disturbing narrative of vampirism, obsession and posession of the soul. But it is also a film directed by Carl Theodor Dreyer, the revered and legendary Danish director of La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc (1927). Shot in France with private money and a largely nonprofessional cast and primitive sound equipment, Vampyr is to some extent a ruin. There is no definitive print and English versions are marred by poor image quality and subtitles. And yet it is unquestionably extraordinary, a vivid and haunting manifestation of Dreyer’s power to make visible on screen the inner human state, and to convey a dreamlike imagery of textures of nature amidst which transient, solitary human figures pass, some illuminated by an inner light, others threatened by a malign or demonic presence. In relation to Dreyer’s long but often frustrated career, Vampyr is often thought of as an uneven or disappointing film. But, according to David Rudkin, this is to misunderstand what it sets out to do, which is systematically to set the spectator adrift in a mysterious world. In a meticulous formal analysis of Vampyr, Rudkin expands on this contention, pinpointing the sources of the film’s uniquely disquieting effect. And yet, however strange it is, Vampyr remains a profound and troubling artwork concerned at the last to communicate human meanings – and none more so than the essence of death – in remarkable filmic imagery.

David Rudkin is a dramatist and screenwriter of forty years’ standing. His theatre work is mainly associated with the Royal Shakespeare Company. Having collaborated with Tony Richardson, FranÁois Truffaut and Fred Zinnemann, his recent screenplays include Testimony (1987), for which he was awarded the New York Film Festival Gold Medal for Screenplay.

80 pages,†Illustrated
Published May 2005
Paperback ISBN: 1844570738

Link courtesy John Coulthart

ARTHUR MAILING LIST BULLETIN No. 0017

“COMMAND PERFORMANCE” -THE ARTHUR MAILING LIST BULLETIN

No. 0017

FRIDAY APRIL 22, 2005

1. TONIGHT, LET IT BE PINCHBECK

People always ask us what columnist Daniel Pinchbeck is *really* like. Well now you can see for yourself, as the man will be live and in the flesh and talking TONIGHT in NEW YORK CITY. Here are the details from the hosts:

“how i learned to stop worrying and love the dimensional shift”

a talk with Arthur columnist Daniel Pinchbeck

Friday, April 22, 2005

8:00 p.m., $10

The Project Room

619 East 6th Street, between B and C

“Daniel’s current book, 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl is on indigenous prophecies, crop circles, shamanism, The Book of Revelation, and other related subjects. He will discuss his research that supports the Mayan Calendar’s projection of the year 2012 as the “end of history” and the movement into a new experience of time and space, as well as the inception of an harmonic and utopian global civilization on the Earth. Open discussion for questions and answers will follow.”

2. NEW ISSUE OF ARTHUR OUT THIS WEEKEND.

Best yet? You be the judge and jury. Rising star M.I.A. on the cover, with a gigantic interview with her by Piotr Orlov on the inside. Erik Davis on a place called Druid Heights. Peter Lamborn Wilson on secessionist movements. Stacy Kranitz visits with surviving black metallers in Scandinavia, with an introduction by metal scholar Ian Christe. Douglas Rushkoff turns his back on the internet. Pinchbeck on transhumanism and nanotech and the Singularity. Comics. C & D on the landmark (!) new album of fuzzed up, psychedelic (!), ear-scalding, mind-melting heavy rock by Sleater-Kinney (!?!?!?). John Payne on new prog by Magma and the Mars Volta. Mike Patton gets in the kitchen. Byron Coley & Thurston Moore get mindzapped. And so on. All free for you. 50,000 copies, going fast. Details here:

http://www.arthurmag.com

3. MATTHEW GREENE EXHIBIT IN LONDON.

Arthur contributing artist Matthew Greene (he did some beautiful illos for the piece on legal magic mushrooms in England in the Jello Biafra issue of Arthur) has a hot new exhibit in London that just opened two days ago. Go here if you can:

Modern Art inc.

10 vyner st.

London E2 9DG

It’s the Bethnal Green stop in the tube.

http://www.modernartinc.com/exhibitions_future.html

4. BASTET NEWS.

Ethan Miller of Comets On Fire has curated a new compilation of spiritual brainfry for Arthur’s Bastet label. The CD is now being mastered. We should have it out before the end of May. Stay tuned. This will be a limited edition thing, with handscreened sleeves and all that quality goodness that we’ve come to expect from the Comets crew.

5. RIGHT ON, ERIC BERNDT!

http://www.wonkette.com/politics/about/scalia-subjected-to-probing-question-the-aftermath-040057.php

Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia visited NYU to receive an honor from the members of the NYU Annual Survey of American Law , which is dedicating their 2005 issue to Scalia.

Scalia is the subject of controversy for his dissenting opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, in which he criticized the decision to overturn a law that criminalized sodomy.

In asking about Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence v. Texas and his view that privacy is not constitutionally protected, Eric Berndt, a law student, shocked the crowd by asking, “Do you sodomize your wife?”

Scalia refused to answer the question while the crowd gasped and the administrators promptly turned off Berndt’s microphone.

Berndt later explained his actions in a post on the Internet:

As the student who asked Justice Scalia about his sexual conduct, I am responding to your posts to explain why I believe I had a right to confront Justice Scalia in the manner I did Tuesday, why any gay or sympathetic person has that same right. It should be clear that I intended to be offensive, obnoxious, and inflammatory. There is a time to discuss and there are times when acts and opposition are necessary. Debate is useless when one participant denies the full dignity of the other. How am I to docilely engage a man who sarcastically rants about the “beauty of homosexual relationships” (at the Q&A) and believes that gay school teachers will try to convert children to a homosexual lifestyle (at oral argument for Lawrence)?

Although my question was legally relevant, as I explain below, an independent motivation for my speech-act was to simply subject a homophobic government official to the same indignity to which he would subject millions of gay Americans. It was partially a naked act of resistance and a refusal to be silenced. I wanted to make him and everyone in the room aware of the dehumanizing effect of trivializing such an important relationship. Justice Scalia has no pity for the millions of gay Americans on whom sodomy laws and official homophobia have such an effect, so it is difficult to sympathize with his brief moment of “humiliation,” as some have called it. The fact that I am a law student and Scalia is a Supreme Court Justice does not require me to circumscribe my justified opposition and outrage within the bounds of jurisprudential discourse.

Law school and the law profession do not negate my identity as a member of an oppressed minority confronting injustice. Even so, I did have a legal point: Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Lawrence asked whether criminalizing homosexual conduct advanced a state interest “which could justify the intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual.” Scalia did not answer this question in his dissent because he believed the state need only assert a legitimate interest to defeat non-fundamental liberties. I basically asked him this question again – it is now the law of the land. He said he did not know whether the interest was significant enough. I then asked him if he sodomizes his wife to subject his intimate relations to the scrutiny he cavalierly would allow others – by force, if necessary. Everyone knew at that moment how significant the interest is. Beyond exerting official power against homosexuals, Scalia is an outspoken and high-profile homophobe. After 

the aforementioned sarcastic remarks about gay people’s relationships, can anyone doubt how little respect he has for LGBT Americans? Even if no case touching gay rights ever came before him, his comments from the bench (that employment non-discrimination is some kind of “homosexual agenda,” etc.) and within our very walls are unacceptable to any self-respecting gay person or principled opponent of discrimination. The idea that I should have treated a man with such repugnant views with deference because he is a high government official evinces either a dangerously un-American acceptance of authority or insensitivity to the gay community’s grievances. Friends have forwarded me emails complaining of the “liberal” student who asked “the question.” That some of my classmates are shallow and insensitive enough to conceptualize my complaint as mere partisan politics is disheartening. Though I should not have to, I will share with everyone that I am neither a Democrat nor Republica!

n and do not consider myself a “liberal” except in the classical sense. I hope that we can separate a simple demand for equality under the law and outrage over being denied it from so much dogmatic ideological baggage. LGBT Americans are still a persecuted minority and our struggle for equal rights is still vital. 4 out of 5 LGBT kids are harassed in school – tell them to debate their harassers. Suicide rates for them are much higher than for others. We still cannot serve in the military, have little protection from employment and other forms of discrimination, and are denied the 1000+ benefits that accrue from official recognition of marriage. I know some who support gay rights oppose my question and our protest. Do not presume to tell me when and with how much urgency to stand up for our rights.

I am 17 months out of a lifelong closet and have lost too much time to heterosexist hegemony to tolerate those who say, as Dr. King put it, “just wait.” If you cannot stomach a breach of decorum when justified outrage erupts then your support is nearly worthless anyway. At least do not allow yourselves to become complicit in discrimination by demanding obedience from its victims. Many of our classmates chose NYU over higher-ranked schools because of our reputation as a “private university in the public service” and our commitment to certain values. We were the first law school to require that employers pledge not to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Of Scalia’s law schools that have “signed on to the homosexual agenda,” our signature stands out like John Hancock’s. We won a federal injunction in the FAIR litigation as an “expressive association” that counts acceptance of sexual orientation as a core value. Those who worry about our school’s prestige should re

member how we got here and consider whether flattering those who mock what we believe and are otherwise willing to fight for appears prestigious or pathetic. We protestors did not embarrass NYU, Scalia embarrassed NYU. We stood up to a bigot for the values that make NYU more than a great place to learn the law. I repeat my willingess to discuss this issue calmly with anyone who respects my identity as a gay man. I have had many productive talks with classmates since Tuesday and I hope that will continue.

Respectfully,

Eric Berndt

And with that inspirational message, we bid you adieu

Arthur Editorial Action Squad

Los Angeles

Still ratfucking.

ABC7Chicago.com: Clinton impeachment was retaliation for Nixon, says retiring congressman

Clinton impeachment was retaliation for Nixon, says retiring congressman

By Andy Shaw
April 21, 2005 ó Republican Congressman Henry Hyde made some surprising comments Thursday on the impeachment hearings of President Bill Clinton. He now says Republicans may have gone after Clinton to retaliate for the impeachment of Richard Nixon. Hyde is stepping down after this term.

Hyde’s comments came as he talked with ABC7 political reporter Andy Shaw about his 30 year in Congress.

In an exclusive interview, Hyde delivered a big dose of candor and some reflective second guessing. He said, among other things, he might not try to impeach President Clinton if he had it to do all over again.

The 81-year-old DuPage County Republican, who mastered the art of disagreeing without being disagreeable, will be stepping down in January of 2007 after 16 terms and 32 years.

“I am leaving voluntarily, but it’s because my physical strength is ebbing. Father Time and Mother Nature have been pursuing me, and I’m 81,” said Rep. Henry Hyde, (R)-Illinois.

Hyde is known for his eloquence, courtesy, civility and his fierce partisanship on behalf of conservative GOP principles, including authorship of the Hyde Amendment, which outlawed federal funding of abortions, and leadership of the House judiciary committee in the impeachment of President Clinton for perjury and obstruction of justice stemming from an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

When asked if he would go through with the Clinton impeachment process again, Hyde said he wasn’t sure. It turned into a personal and political embarrassment for Hyde when an extra-marital affair he had in the 1960’s became public amid accusations of hypocrisy. He called the affair a youthful indiscretion.

“Accusations hurled at me to intimidate me were misplaced, and I regret having to deal with them, but they didn’t intimidate me,” Hyde said.

The veteran DuPage County congressman acknowledged that Republicans went after Clinton in part to enact revenge against the Democrats for impeaching President Richard Nixon 25 years earlier.

Andy Shaw asked Hyde if the Clinton proceedings were payback for Nixon’s impeachment.

“I can’t say it wasn’t, but I also thought that the Republican party should stand for something, and if we walked away from this, no matter how difficult, we could be accused of shirking our duty, our responsibility,” said Hyde.

Hyde’s comments reflect what Democrats have been saying for years about the Clinton impeachment. It will be interesting to see what happens when Hyde’s comments hit the national media.

Hyde’s style will be missed in Washington, as well as his sense of civility, even though a lot of people will not miss his rigid ideology.

Ayahuasca and problem solving…

Stirred and shaken

Faced by difficult choices both in his life and fiction, and encouraged by the examples of Peter Matthiessen and Allen Ginsberg, Henry Shukman tried ayahuasca, the hallucinogenic Amazonian vine

Henry Shukman
Saturday March 12, 2005
The Guardian

Santa Fe, the “City Different”, known to some as FantaSe, is the city where you can hire a horse to be your shrink (“equine-assisted psychotherapy”), where your child can play with a hula-hoop “charged with Plutonian energy” (more grounding than Neptunian), and where the nose can be the centre of all health diagnosis (“Noseology”).

New Mexico’s state capital stands at 7,000 feet on a desert plateau that reaches all the way to Arizona, with the Sangre de Cristo mountains rising to blood-red, 13,000-foot peaks behind. At the end of the long trail from St Louis, Santa Fe – with its many giant mud buildings that look as if they belong in Timbuktu, but are in fact modern hotels, banks, shopping centres – has been the natural home of the eccentric since the turn of the 20th century, when the five painters known as the Cinco Pintores fled the straight-laced East Coast and settled nearby. New Mexico is the only place where DH Lawrence ever owned a house. Dennis Hopper and the infamous Bean Farm Commune (where the acid trip in Easy Rider was filmed); Bob Dylan, Janis Joplin, Aldous Huxley, Kerouac, Kesey – there’s hardly an artistic or counter-cultural luminary of the past few decades who hasn’t passed through.

It is now the mecca of heterodox DIY spirituality. So it’s not surprising there are no fewer than two “churches” in town devoted to the use of ayahuasca, an Amazonian vine of terrifying narcotic potency. One of them was in the news lately. A member of the congregation, a prominent industrialist, challenged a legal ruling that had made ayahuasca, his sacrament, a banned drug. He won, and in spite of its being one of the strongest hallucinogens known to humanity, it is now officially legal in New Mexico (a state whose last governor was pro-cannabis).

The literary apology for – or anyway fascination with – hard drugs is nothing new. From Homer’s lotus-eaters right through to Irvine Welsh’s e- and smack-consumers, western literature has always had room for drugs. But the extent of the accommodation surely expanded hugely in the 1950s, when that pre- or proto-Beat Huxley famously experimented with mescalin. The idea that drugs could offer not just a short-cut to pleasure and escape but a glimpse into a fundamental spiritual reality entered the zeitgeist, as well as the canon, then. Take this pill and become as enlightened as a mystic.

No wonder writers, ever hungry for experience and understanding (like everyone else but maybe more so), have been drawn to them. But in spite of its potency, ayahuasca has had relatively little literary treatment.

I first heard of it in an ethnographic film during which an anthropology don from Cambridge, squatting in a clearing in the Colombian Amazon, clad in a loin-cloth and several necklaces (and visibly whiter and more bearded than everyone else in shot), submitted to having powdered ayahuasca blown up his nose. An Amerindian elder put his lips to one end of a blow-pipe, while the innocent anthropologist waited curiously at the other, the tube jammed in a nostril. Suddenly he spun away clutching his face as if he’d been knifed, shrieking.

If he had been hoping to step through the doors of heaven and hell, he’d found hell first. After a few moments of stumbling about in agony, he bent double and started to vomit. A voice-over blithely commented that yag?© , as they call it down there, typically caused severe nausea in the user, and that the Indians regarded this as an important function of the drug, which was a purga del anima, or purge of the soul. It didn’t look like a lot of fun.

On the whole, other people’s drug experiences are probably about as interesting as other people’s dreams, on or off the page. It may have the biggest cult following around, but Hunter S Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas left me wishing I’d read it at the right time, back when I was a student happy to supplement the syllabus with a chemical education. But some literary drug trips make spectacular reading, and one of the best (up there with Will Self’s breathtaking psychotic sex session in Great Apes ) happens to be an ayahuasca trip, rendered brilliantly by Peter Matthiessen in his under-read masterpiece of a novel, At Play in the Fields of the Lord. It goes on for a few dozen exhilarating pages, in the course of which an imbiber of a double-dose of ayahuasca tea flies his private plane over the vast carpet of the Amazonian forest, and finds himself bailing out (he somehow remembers his parachute) over an uncontacted Indian village. Matthiessen’s gravity, imagination and powers of description are at full throttle. Drugs can be good for a writer; you can tell he’d tried it, and can’t help being glad he did.

Ginsberg too experimented with it, in Peru in 1960, and it features in his correspondence with William Burroughs (published as The Yag?© Letters ); WS Merwin wrote a long poem about it (“The Real Life of Manuel Cordova”); and Mario Vargas Llosa touches on it in The Storyteller. But other than this, ayahuasca remains for the most part an obscure or unknown initiation.

Considering Santa Fe’s heritage, it oughtn’t to have been a surprise when a local friend told me he’d taken this elusive intoxicant recently, with a visiting Peruvian shaman, and wouldn’t I like to try it? He had turned into a panther stalking the rainforest (feline-assisted psychotherapy?), had never felt so good, and so on.

And the vomiting? I asked. He shrugged. Once or twice. No big deal.

To cut a long story short, he persuaded me. As it happened, I had been working on a novel set partly in Peru, and I thought maybe the influence of a Peruvian shaman and his potions might somehow help, especially since I was stuck, and had advanced little in weeks. I was also pondering whether to apply to extend the teaching job I had in New Mexico, and couldn’t make up my mind. Perhaps a little rainforest synaptic adjustment would shake out some decisive clarity. And on top of that, I was curious.

First I had to call someone called Ramon.

“Sure, hey,” Ramon said, like he had been expecting my call. “We’re meeting this Saturday to do some singing.”

Singing?

“Sure, we’ll be singing all night,” he said with an odd emphasis, and the penny dropped: code.

“Don’t eat that day,” he added.

The whole day?

So five days later, ravenous and already light-headed with fasting, I found myself standing outside a dance studio in Santa Fe, along with about 40 others, as another watery New Mexican twilight lingered beneath a high glassy sky. We filed in and sat around the walls on blankets. The “ceremony” would go on all night. The shaman and his white-robed helpers went round the room with incense and holy water, and everyone was given a small plastic bowl for the anticipated purge. After that came a glass of a disgusting, gruelly, riverine potion – the tea itself. The lights went out. Some of the assistant shamans started to sing songs. Others mimicked the calls of Amazonian birds so well that the room seemed to echo like the rainforest, and I wondered if the drug was already taking effect.

The first effect was the appearance out of nowhere of geometric multi-coloured patterns forming and re-forming in time with the songs. I could “see” them whether my eyes were open or closed. They were embarrassingly hippie-kaleidoscopic, but there they were. The “eye of the soul opening”, apparently: seeing in the dark. Then suddenly everything vanished. No singing, no kaleidoscope, no nothing. I felt that I had shot up out of my body and was floating in the midst of black, silvery space. It was silent and still, and I was completely calm. I needed nothing, never had and never would.

Then I somehow became aware of a ruinous, exhausted tangle of four human limbs far, far below me, slumped on a wooden floor.

Alas, I knew that somehow I was committed to that body, I had a responsibility to it, and it was drawing me back. The next thing I knew I was back in the room vomiting all over myself, groping for my little bowl.

I became a motionless lizard coated in many-coloured tiles, as if each cell of my hide were a piece of a mosaic. I couldn’t have moved a muscle if I’d wanted to. Then the nausea came back and I started to get scared. I don’t like being sick at the best of times, but here, each time I felt the nausea, it seemed it would last for ever. In that grossly altered state if something lasted a minute it was an eternity. A deep discomfort sprang up from nowhere, and once again I retched. Then once more, ethereal silence, complete peace.

I sweated, I groaned and curled up in a ball, trying to get comfortable, I lay down, and moaned to myself. After every seizure of the stomach, perfect peace. Then back the nausea would come.

The shaman attempted to rouse and fortify me at one point by grabbing my wrists. “Fuerte, fuerte [be strong],” he exhorted me. By then, I longed to sleep. Around me the singing had long since stopped. Instead there was a chorus of violent retching coming from all over the room.

When the drug began to wear off I looked at my watch and could understand what it said again. Three in the morning. The singing resumed. Slowly, one by one, people stood up and moved about. Some danced gently. It was maybe another hour after that that I felt able to stand. Afterwards a woman said to me: “This is as close as a man can get to knowing what it’s like giving birth.” There had been moments of perfect bliss, which it felt good to have known, but mostly there had been nausea and terror.

Yet strangely there were pay-offs. Firstly, the relief of having my mind back afterwards. Maybe my mind wasn’t so bad after all. I was exhausted, but also glowing, scoured, somehow clean within. When I walked outside into the dawn air, and saw the pale sky, the green mountains in the distance subtly infused with gold light, I felt like I was 19 again.

“First time?” a silver-haired old hand asked me afterwards, as I stood blinking in the cold dawn, wondering where I had just been.

“Yes.”

“Did you die?” he asked me.

So that was what had happened. “I thought I’d given birth to an asteroid,” I explained seriously. “Except I was the asteroid.”

“Uh-huh,” he nodded. “That’s good. We are asteroids.”

Right.

Be that as it may – and good or not – that afternoon the novel I was stuck on opened up like an Ordnance Survey map, and I could see the whole plot at last. I covered a giant sheet of A2 with notes and plans.

Are there shortcuts in this life? Do those ancient tribes of Amazonia know things we don’t? The only things I could be sure of were that with or without ayahuasca’s help, there would be months of hard slog ahead if I was ever going to finish the book; and that I hoped very much never to touch the stuff again.

¬? A paperback edition of Henry Shukman’s Darien Dogs (Vintage), and a new novel, Sandstorm (Jonathan Cape) are published in June.

Link courtesy John Coulthart