Report: Suicidal troops sent into combat
U.S. military violated own rules on mentally ill troops, newspaper finds
The Associated Press
Updated: 10:04 p.m. ET May 13, 2006
HARTFORD, Conn. – U.S. military troops with severe psychological problems have been sent to Iraq or kept in combat, even when superiors have been aware of signs of mental illness, a newspaper reported for Sunday editions.
The Hartford Courant, citing records obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act and more than 100 interviews of families and military personnel, reported numerous cases in which the military failed to follow its own regulations in screening, treating and evacuating mentally unfit troops from Iraq.
In 1997, Congress ordered the military to assess the mental health of all deploying troops. The newspaper, citing Pentagon statistics, said fewer than 1 in 300 service members were referred to a mental health professional before shipping out for Iraq as of October 2005.
Twenty-two U.S. troops committed suicide in Iraq last year, accounting for nearly one in five of all non-combat deaths and was the highest suicide rate since the war started, the newspaper said.
Some service members who committed suicide in 2004 and 2005 were kept on duty despite clear signs of mental distress, sometimes after being prescribed antidepressants with little or no mental health counseling or monitoring. Those findings conflict with regulations adopted last year by the Army that caution against the use of antidepressants for ìextended deployments.î
ìI canít imagine something more irresponsible than putting a soldier suffering from stress on (antidepressants), when you know these drugs can cause people to become suicidal and homicidal,î said Vera Sharav, president of the Alliance for Human Research Protection. ìYouíre creating chemically activated time bombs.î
Although Defense Department standards for enlistment disqualify recruits who suffer ìpersistent post-traumatic symptoms,î the military also is redeploying service members to Iraq who fit that criteria, the newspaper said.
ìIím concerned that people who are symptomatic are being sent back. That has not happened before in our country,î said Dr. Arthur S. Blank, Jr., a Yale-trained psychiatrist who helped to get post-traumatic stress disorder recognized as a diagnosis after the Vietnam War.
The Armyís top mental health expert, Col. Elspeth Ritchie, acknowledged that some deployment practices, such as sending service members diagnosed with post-traumatic stress syndrome back into combat, have been driven in part by a troop shortage.
ìThe challenge for us … is that the Army has a mission to fight. And, as you know, recruiting has been a challenge,î she said. ìAnd so we have to weigh the needs of the Army, the needs of the mission, with the soldiersí personal needs.î
Ritchie insisted the military works hard to prevent suicides, but is a challenge because every soldier has access to a weapon.
Commanders, not medical professionals, have final say over whether a troubled soldier is retained in the war zone. Ritchie and other military officials said they believe most commanders are alert to mental health problems and are open to referring troubled soldiers for treatment.
ìYour average commander doesnít want to deal with a whacked-out soldier. But on the other hand, he doesnít want to send a message to his troops that if you act up, heís willing to send you home,î said Maj. Andrew Efaw, a judge advocate general officer in the Army Reserves who handled trial defense for soldiers in northern Iraq last year.