“Ecstasy: In and About Altered States”
THERE IS A MOMENT in Talo/The House, 2002, a video installation by the Finnish artist Eija-Liisa Ahtila currently on display at the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art, where the furtive glimpse of a dog triggers an altogether different kind of vision: “Outside a new order arose, one that is present everywhere. Everything is now simultaneous, here, being.” The monologue is derived from the artist’s interviews with schizophrenics and other people suffering from mental disorders, but we have all known moments like this, when we harbor intimations of a deeper design, of a dream logic beneath the surface of things, of an incandescence in the mind. These intensitiesóperhaps nothing more than shivers of the brainóare the grace notes of consciousness, known empirically before they are known conceptually. But even the most direct experience of trance or intoxication is refracted through cultural artifacts, through storybooks or pills or paintings. Despite their intimate character, in other words, we know altered states partly through mediated ones.
At its best, “Ecstasy: In and About Altered States” (curated by Paul Schimmel) foregrounds this tension between experience and mediation, a tension carried in the very resonance of the word ecstasy. The Neoplatonist Plotinus used the term ecstasis to describe mystic transcendence, the “flight of the alone to the Alone”; later Bernini famously incarnated a more devotional sense of transport in his trembling St. Theresa, which few of us can observe without imagining more carnal forces than God parting the saint’s lips. This is what happens to ecstasy, for usóit moves from God to orgasm. And now that Ecstasy is the name of one of the most popular recreational drugs on the planet, a phenethylamine capable of delivering its own beatific intensities, we can see how far we have come. Rather than Plotinus’s flight from matter, ecstasy has become a controlled substance.
Carsten Hller, Upside-Down Mushroom Room, 2000, polystrol, polyester, wood, paint, metal, electrical motors, plasterboard, neon light, and glass, 14′ 9″ x 19′ 9″ x 41′.
The wall text that introduces the MoCA show nowhere mentions drugs, although terms such as altered, intoxicating, hallucinatory, and the more classical bacchanalia let us know where we stand. On one hand, this ambivalence is key: The question of how the experience of psychoactive substances such as MDMA or LSD relates to other unusual mind states is a vexed issue, one that echoes crucial contemporary concerns about simulation and the manufacture of subjectivity. But by loosely jumbling drugs with a wide variety of altered statesóhypnosis, sleep, madness, perceptual illusionóthe show seems muddled from the onset.
Certainly there are drugs throughout the show, or rather, “drugs.” Psychoactive mushrooms, either the Santa Claus caps of fly agaric or the more commonly consumed Psilocybe cubensis, are scattered throughout the museumóa scattering that becomes, in Roxy Paine’s 1997 Psilocybe Cubensis Field, at once exuberant and creepy. More than two thousand impeccably hand-painted polymer casts run riot across the floor, uniting Paine’s long-standing concerns with the copy and the interpenetration of the artificial and the organic. All fungi are essentially replicants, after all, since a given patch of individual mushrooms will generally share the same DNA. Their sculptural multiplication across the gallery floor generates an uncanny quality common to both organic and technological modes of replicationóan almost animistic sense of iteration that also enchants psychedelic perception, which can make the most innocuous floorboards seethe and sprout to multitudinous life.
Of course, that a collection of actual Psilocybe cubensis in a gallery would constitute felony possession makes Paine’s simulacra more safe than subversive. You will not get high from these objects: They are all surface; they only remind. Ditto for Tom Friedman’s 1997 Untitled, a pile of pills whose obsessive and accurate fabrication from Play-Doh twists the knob up on Paine’s piece by skipping nature and just simulating the synthetic. Friedman’s empty fetishes, though, are juxtaposed with his 1992ñ97 piece 1,000 Hours of Staring, a square piece of white paper whose status as an art object rests with the artist’s claim that he stared at the thing off and on for a thousand hours. Despite its surface cleverness, 1,000 Hours is one of the rare pieces in the show with an inside. In other words, in the midst of knowing mediation, Friedman provides a trace of raw experience: a Duchampian gag that actually imbues the object with a state of mindóeven if that mind is just sitting in a room, bored out of its skull.
Perhaps the show’s most perceptive framing of this Mobius strip of mind and object lies in the three-tier water fountain that forms the central element of Klaus Weber’s proposed Public Fountain LSD Hall, 2003. The water cycling through the delicate glass structure, made of scavenged Victorian crystal, carries what a framed certificate assures us is a homeopathic trace of LSD-25. Homeopathic remedies, widely embraced in the artist’s native Germany, rely on dosages so subtle that in the eyes of conventional science they don’t even exist. Besides gesturing toward the tiny scale of the LSD molecule (with active doses measured in micrograms, LSD is one of the most potent psychoactive substances known), Weber’s invocation of homeopathy suggests an alchemical perception of the signatures and subtle energies that skirt our conventional understanding of matter. In addition, homeopathic remedies work by introducing a trace of the offending disorder. Weber, then, is suggesting that we are already tripping and that we can only be cured by what already ails us. And as you lean toward the fountain, you understand what he means, for the dripping water falls and plays with such plangency across the glass that you could swear a music box is concealed somewhere. But it is only a singing crystal you hear, or your mind tuning to a singing crystalóas fit a metaphor as you need for the visionary potential of crystal solids such as LSD. By switching sensory registers from vision to sound and from sound to music, the fountain stages the sort of perceptual surprise that lies at the heart of psychedelic experience.
Naturally, you are prevented from dipping your finger into the fountain by a surrounding cage of Plexiglas, and even leaning in too closely will rouse the ire of MoCA’s persnickety guards. These conditions are not incidental. One of the core maxims of postwar psychedelic culture is “Set and setting”: The trip is contextual, dependent on personal attitude and environment as much as on the substance swimming in your brain. In a museum, the set is as varied as each person, but the issue of setting raises some sharp questions about the limitations of the institution when works of ecstasy or transport or visionary experience are on the lineówhen we are in as well as about altered states. It is one thing to follow a dark and mazy corridor into a white room where rotating fly agaric mushrooms dangle from the ceiling; it is another to enter the space with a gruff guard staring you down. You police the obvious impulse, which is not just to appreciate Carsten Hller’s playful interrogation of perception, with its Eleusinian echoes, but to run around and take snapshots of your companions. Yes, there is serious inquiry in the piece, but there is also celebration, and the impossibility of celebrating in MoCA made me long for a blank void very different from the white cubicles of the museum. It made me long for Burning Man.
It is perhaps unfair to compare a downtown museum of contemporary art with the dry alkaline lake bed in Nevada that annually provides home to a hedonistic freak festival, but the freak festival in question has also established probably the most creatively sustained counterhegemonic site for mass public art production and consumption in the developed world. It is true, of course, that a lot of art at Burning Man is bad and that a lot that is good on the playa would be bad elsewhere. But the strongest sculptors and installation artists at the event drink deeply from Weber’s fountain, taking on the conundrums of “altered art” with fierce joy. Indeed, frequent habituÈs of Burning Man’s Black Rock City will experience a number of flashbacks visiting the MoCA show. Erwin Redl’s matrix of green LEDs, Sylvie Fleury’s glitzy space pod, the profane neon illuminations of assume vivid astro focus’s porno disco, even Olafur Eliasson’s quietly sublime strobing rainóall rely on tricks and rhetoric that have, simply put, been executed with more playfulness and greater formal power on the playa.
The point is not that Burning Man is better but that the art of altered states depends in part on a lack of temerity before the exuberance of visionary experience. One oblique way into this breach, of course, is through the wonder-working powers of popular culture, which in today’s art world frequently means Japanese popular culture. Inevitably, “Ecstasy” includes some of Takashi Murakami’s silly mushrooms, so flavorless in comparison with the immensely popular organic fantasies of, say, manga and anime master Hayao Miyazaki. Of greater interest is a gorgeous and crafty piece of animation by Chiho Aoshima. A single seven-minute reverse tracking shot distributed across five plasma screens, City Glow, 2005, unfolds like a trip or a myth: We fall away from a wormlike cityscape and move, at a child’s height, into the transformations of nature and season and death. Crossed signals ariseófish float through the air, a bunny caws like a crowóbut the goofiness is undermined by a graveyard populated by Aoshima’s patented horror-show nymphets, who are themselves replaced by a no less disturbing Tinkerbell heaven of fairies and rainbows. The key element is the long pullback. We are looking in the rearview mirror at a way of seeing that lies behind usóin the long-ago of childhood, but also in the history of visual expression, in that visionary capacity now largely swallowed up by commodified technological fantasy.
And yet many contemporary artists produce visionary material without leaning on pop culture. Whatever its satiric undertow, Ye Olde Ruin, 2003ñ2004, one of two immense Paul Noble drawings included in “Ecstasy,” offers an unabashedly fantastic otherworld of abstract machines, hermetic eggs, and Boschean play. But the show’s most explicitly visionary art belongs to the Brooklyn artist Fred Tomaselli, who continues to refine and intensify his bold explorations of collage, visual rhythm, and pinwheel psychedelia. Like Paine and Friedman, Tomaselli draws attention to the actual thingsóthe pills and organic materialsóthat mediate psychoactive experience. But as he painstakingly arranges these things and others into the thick resin that coats his hybrid collage-paintings, he dematerializes them as well, revealing their potential to become elements of mind and pattern, like the string figures in Harry Smith movies or the inner-eye whirligigs captured in his recent Millennium Phosphene Bloom, 2005.
Another remarkable new work by Tomaselli, 2005’s Organism, shows a man with transparent skin plunging headless into a crystal chaos of stars, spiderwebs, and fractured mandalas. The piece seems to literally embody the difficult human transition between meat and mental ecstasy, but its full resonance only becomes clear when compared to the similarly semitransparent bodies in the work of Alex Grey, another Brooklyn artist and one of the most dominant painters in the largely marginalized world of contemporary psychedelic art. Though Grey’s art graces rave fliers and New Age calendars, he is no naÔfóthe declarative intensity of his strongest paintings depends in part on his sly appropriation of textbook medical imagery, whose hyperreal rhetoric paradoxically lends an air of actuality to his visionary bodies. But Grey is too much of a mystic literalist for his work to ever make it to the walls of MoCA; transcendence, even if it is just a trick of immanence, is still taboo. Whereas Grey’s transformed figures confidently ascend into rainbow mind-lattices, Tomaselli’s organism plunges into the fractured rag-and-bone shop of the head, delivering the more assimilable message that ecstasy is rarely far from the abject.
Erik Davis is a San Francisco-based writer and author of the forthcoming book The Visionary State (Chronicle Books, 2006).