"THE GODS ARE ANGRY."

22 JULY 2002: “THE GODS
ARE ANGRY.”

July
21, 2002  |  ESCRAVOS, Nigeria (AP)
— A huge fire broke
out Saturday at ChevronTexaco’s main oil terminal, days after unarmed village
women ended a 10-day siege that crippled the oil giant’s Nigeria operations.


    The
blaze at the multimillion-dollar Escravos terminal in southeastern Nigeria
was ignited by a bolt of lightning during
an early morning storm, the company said in a statement.

    
The lightning set fire to a storage tank containing about 180,000 barrels
of crude oil. Oil workers used remote-controlled chemical cannons to contain
the blaze and pumped about 80,000 barrels out of the burning tank.


    Additional
support was requested from other oil operators, the statement said.


    No one
was hurt, the company said.


    The fire
sent giant flames and a towering pillar of black smoke into the sky.


    “The
gods are angry. Chevron needs to compensate us for this land. The women
leave, and two days later, this thing happens,” said unemployed villager
Lucky Mune, as he watched the blaze from a distance.


    The fire
was the latest blow to a company still facing a series of takeovers at
its Nigerian facilities by unarmed village women.

    Meanwhile
Saturday, unarmed women occupying at least four ChevronTexaco facilities
in southeastern Nigeria said Saturday they had freed their two hostages
in return for a promise from oil executives to meet with them.


    The women,
who live nearby, are demanding jobs for their relatives as well as electricity,
water and other amenities. The protest follows a larger but similar action
at ChevronTexaco’s main oil terminal that involved about 700 workers —
including Americans, Britons, Canadians and Nigerians — being held captive
for 10 days.


    The women,
ranging in age from 30 to 90, used a traditional and powerful shaming gesture
to maintain control over the facility — they threatened to remove their
own clothing.


    The hostages
were freed only after the company pledged to build modern towns out of
poor villages.


    As that
protest was ending, several hundred women from a rival tribe seized at
least four ChevronTexaco flowstations in the same area. On Friday, the
women occupying the Abiteye station took two workers captive, both Nigerians.
They were apparently the only employees who stayed behind after the protest
action began.


    One,
a security supervisor, was released hours later and the other, a community
relations officer, was allowed to leave Saturday. Far from appearing traumatized,
he waved to the women, who cheered as he boarded a ferry.

    Fanty
Wariyai, a protest leader, said ChevronTexaco promised to send a senior
official to meet with the women on Monday. ChevronTexaco officials could
not immediately be reached for comment.


    The protest
turned into a hostage-taking after ChevronTexaco angered the women by asking
them to send representatives to a meeting with company officials and tribal
leaders in the southern city of Warri.


    “They
want us to meet the community leaders who are men, who live in Warri, and
who don’t know our suffering,” Josephine Ogoba, another protest leader,
said Friday. “If Chevron will not come here, we will not allow their staff
to go.”


    The peaceful,
all-woman protests are a departure for the oil-rich Niger Delta, where
armed men frequently use kidnapping and sabotage to pressure oil companies
to give them jobs, protection money or compensation for alleged environmental
damage.


    The Niger
Delta is one of the West African country’s poorest regions, despite its
oil wealth. Nigeria is the world’s sixth-largest exporter of oil and the
fifth-largest supplier to the United States.

"Maybe I overreacted…"

21 JULY 2002: “Maybe
I overreacted…”

Man, fearing terrorists, fires at helicopter

July 20, 2002 Posted: 1:22
PM EDT (1722 GMT)

WILLIAMSBURG, Virginia (AP)
— A man armed with an assault-style rifle opened fire on a helicopter
landing in a residential neighborhood, thinking the chopper was carrying
terrorists, police said.


    Helicopter
pilot John S. Sutton landed his helicopter July 13 at the home of businessman
John Peters to pick him up, police said.


    John
Chwaszczewski, a semiretired construction worker, became alarmed when he
saw the chopper swoop down over his garage, about a block from Peters’
home.


    “Maybe
I overreacted, but I did feel this was terrorism at its utmost,” Chwaszczewski
said.

    Chwaszczewski
told police the shooting was “a natural reaction,” after having watched
the events of September 11.


    A woman
who identified herself as Sutton’s wife said he would have no comment.


    Sutton
was charged with recklessly operating an aircraft, a misdemeanor, Deputy
Police Chief Ken Middlebrook said Friday. If convicted, he could face a
month in jail.


    Chwaszczewski
was charged with interfering with an aircraft, discharging a firearm, an
AR-15 rifle, in a public place, reckless handling of a firearm and assaulting
Sutton. He faces up to eight years in prison and $10,000 in fines if convicted.

"WHAT EXACTLY HAPPENED IN CLEVELAND IN THE EARLY '70S TO MAKE IT SUCH AN INSANELY CREATIVE SPOT?"

20 JULY 2002: “WHAT EXACTLY
HAPPENED IN CLEVELAND IN THE EARLY ’70S TO MAKE IT SUCH AN INSANELY CREATIVE
SPOT?”

From: http://www.projex.demon.co.uk/archives/keenan.html

David Thomas interviewed by David Keenan

Looking back on these
tapes now, how do you feel about them?

I’m not sure what you mean.
Am I nostalgic about them? No. Am I embarrassed or shy about them? No.
Do they reveal anything to me? No. I suppose one of the problems has always
been that this phase of our history has never been made public. We started
out dedicated to hard, groove rock. Midwestern garage rock. We remain dedicated
to hard, groove rock. Midwestern garage rock. This is the foundation but
like many foundations maybe it rests unnoticed. You have to remember the
Prime Directive: Never repeat yourself. At all costs, and beyond any reason
or logic, keep moving. So we made this music in 1974-5. It’s hard, groove
rock played with passion and unwavering dedication. Isn’t that what you’re
supposed to do? And once you’ve proved that you HAVE the Right Stuff you
move forward or you slip backwards. Only the dead remain secure.

What exactly happened
in Cleveland during the early-Seventies to make it such an insanely creative
spot? Most people think of these years as a bit of a black hole for outsider
rock ‘n’ roll – how come it was so different in Cleveland? Was the fact
that The Velvet Underground had pulled through there a couple of times
really that significant?

Alot of things came together
in one place and one time. I’m tired of going thru the story but I’ll give
it a shot one last time.

(1.) It was a unique generational
window. Charlotte Pressler described it best in her piece, “Those Were
Different Times.” I quote the first few paragraphs.

“This is a story about life
in Cleveland from 1968 to 1975, when a small group of people were evolving
styles of music that would, much later, come to be called “New Wave.” Misleadingly
so, because that term suggests the current situation, in which an already
evolved, recognized “New Wave” style exists for new bands to aim at. The
task of this group was different: to evolve the style itself, while at
the same time struggling to find in themselves the authority and confidence
to play it. And they had to do this in a total vacuum. The whole system
of New Wave interconnections which made it possible for every second person
on Manhattan’s Lower East Side to become a star did not exist. There were
no stars in Cleveland. Nobody cared what these people were doing. If they
did anything at all, they did it for themselves. They adapted to those
conditions in different ways. Some are famous. Some are still struggling.
One is dead.

“There are questions I would
like to know the answers to. Why, for example, are so many of the people
in this story drawn from the same background? Most of them were from middle
or upper-middle class families. Most were very intelligent. Many of them
could have been anything they chose to be. There was no reason why they
should not have effected an entry into the world of their parents. Yet
all of them turned their backs on this world, and that meant making a number
of very painful choices. First, there was the decision not to go to college
at a time when the draft was still in effect and the Vietnam War was still
going on; and several of these people were drafted. Most of these people
did not marry; those that did generally did not have children; few of them
worked jobs for very long; and the jobs they did hold were low-paying and
dull, a long ways from a “career.” Yet they were not drop-outs in the Sixties
sense; they felt, if anything, a certain affection for consumerist society,
and a total contempt for the so-called counterculture. The Sixties drop-outs
dropped in to a whole world of people just like themselves but these people
were on their own.

“You can ask, also, why they
all turned to rock ‘n’ roll. Most of these people were not natural musicians.
Peter perhaps was, and Albert Dennis, and Scott Krauss; but John Morton
and David Thomas and Allen Ravenstine and Jaime Klimek would probably have
done something else, if there had been anything else for them to do. One
can ask why there wasn’t; why rock ‘n’ roll seemed to be the only choice.

“I would like to know too
the source of the deep rage that runs through this story like a razor-edged
wire. It was a desperate, stubborn refusal of the world, a total rejection;
the kind of thing that once drove men into the desert, but our desert was
the Flats. Remember that the people who did this music had an uncompromising
stance that gave them no way up and no way out. It was the inward-turning,
defiant stance of a beleaguered few who felt themselves to be outside music,
beneath media attention, and without hope of an audience. It seems that
the years from 1974 to 1978 in Cleveland were a flash point, a quick and
brilliant explosion, even epochal, but over with and done. No amount of
nostalgia can bring those years back; they were different times. Still,
I can’t imagine living any other way than the way I learned to live in
Cleveland during those years. We found it hard, in 1975, to imagine that
anyone would live to see the year 2000. It’s not that hard to imagine it
now. What’s become hard to imagine – but then why would we want to recapture
it? – is the timeless, frozen, quality of life as we lived it in 1975,
in the terminal landscape of Cleveland, with our drivenness, our rage,
and our dreams of breaking through.”

(2) Cleveland was, in the
early 70s, a nexus for all music. Record shops competed for the new and
cutting, for the complete and final word. Almost everyone I can think of
who was in a band was working in a record store. Not only the college radio
stations but even local commercial FM stations played radical music. So
the “scene” in Cleveland was compact, informed, tough and protected from
any threat of fame or acceptance.

(3) We were the Ghoulardi
kids.
It’s been suggested by any number of us that the Cleveland/Akron event
of the early 70s was attributable in large part to his influence. I was
ten in 1963 when he went on air and 13 when he left Cleveland in 1966.
After him I believe that I could only have perceived the nature of media
and the possibilities of the narrative voice in particular ways. Describing
how he devastated the authority of the media, and of the Great and the
Good, how he turned the world upside down, would take too long and would
be too hard to translate– a dumb slogan or two, some primitive blue screen
technique, and a couple firecrackers for 90 minutes on the TV every Friday
night, how unsafe could that be? You have no idea. He
was the Flibberty Jib Man.

(4) Don’t dismiss the power
of The Velvets. Yes, it was a big deal. It changed lives. Every band in
Cleveland in the early 70s could do Foggy Notion, for example– all that
unreleased stuff that would later appear on bootlegs– but learned from
cassettes. Doing Sweet Jane was such a rube thing to do it came to be a
litmus test for naffness– like doing Smoke On The Water or something.
Bands from AKRON would do Sweet Jane!

Rocket From The Tombs
almost seem now like some kind of early testing ground for the new punk
rock/avant rock. Their impact seems to be more in the way that they infected
other groups – Pere Ubu, Dead Boys etc – was there something so intense
and charged about that grouping that meant it would always be an unstable
entity? Does the fact that its legacy is so fractured bother you?

RFTT was always doomed. Everything
from Cleveland was doomed. RFTT is totally inconsequential and irrelevant.
Pere Ubu is totally inconsequential and irrelevant. That is the power of
Cleveland. Embrace, my brothers, the utter futility of ambition and desire.
Your only reward is a genuine shot at being the best. The caveat is that
no one but your brothers will ever know it. That’s the deal we agreed to.

Looking back at the
lyrical pre-occupations and the casualties that resulted, that whole scene
seems an intensely nihilistic/apocalyptic one – would you agree with this
perception? What was it that fuelled such nihilism? Or was it just an as-serous-as-your-life
approach to art?

I don’t know what drove it.
Of course we were serious. What kind of question is that? It was a compact
and isolated group of people. The rivalries were intense. The disdain for
anything anodyne was immediate and severe. It was a hothouse environment.
Lots of the people lived on the urban frontier. Allen, Peter and all the
crew at the Plaza were real urban pioneers. It could get weird. And we
were young. We had turned our backs on the hippies and we
had rejected the safe course thru college
. (Until just recently
no Ubu member had ever graduated from college– or even lasted more than
a year! And we were smart kids and EVERYBODY went to college in those days.)
So we were drawn to art and in the early 70s rock music was the only valid
art form. Rock music was the cutting edge. If you were good you went into
rock. If you were 2nd string, if you were not quite good enough, then maybe
you wrote or painted or made films. Who cares?

How do Pere Ubu and
Rocket relate? Are the Ubu seeds to be found in Rocket or would you say
Ubu’s project was distinctly different?

I don’t know. They relate
because Peter and I went on to form Pere Ubu and so for us it was a continuum.
For Scott Krauss, for example, or Allen Ravenstine, or Tom Herman, it was
not.

Were you consciously
trying to bring the techniques of the avant-garde to rock music? Was it
as theoretical as that or was it more to do with taking rock ‘n’ roll at
its word and freaking with it?

Rock is the avant garde.
There was no question of taking one to the other. This is a racial problem.
Because you are a foreigner you don’t understand the nature of rock music
as a cultural voice, as the American folk experience, so you are always
looking to interpret it in alien terms. This was the problem with punk.
Punk
was an imperialistic grab at someone else’s culture fueled by chicken-hawkers,
multi-national corporations and a guy who wanted to sell clothes. It provided
a dumbed-down template aimed at the lowest-common denominator that sold
the Big Lie that art was something ANYBODY could do. Well it wasn’t. It
isn’t. It never will be.
(I always had this problem at Rough
Trade in any Desert Island Disk debate– no one believed, that given one
record to take, I wouldn’t hesitate a nanosecond to choose John Cougar
Mellenkamp’s out-takes to any Smiths record. John Cougar was playing the
music of his culture with an authentic voice, that Smiths guy, hard as
he tried, as great as he was, as much as I liked what he did, could never
disguise the stone cold fact that he was a foreigner and once removed from
the True Moment.)

The liners to the new
CD make the point that if this grouping had released an LP it would be
seen in the same historical light as Horses, The Velvet Underground &

Nico, Kick Out The Jams and The Stooges 1st – what do you think? Do you
have any regrets about the fact that this group never made it to the LP
stage and were never fully documented? Are there any other RFTT jewels
hidden in the vaults?

Yes, I suppose it would have
been a great record. So? There are many great records. There are many that
haven’t been made. I am always proud to be counted among the Brotherhood
of the Unknown.

How do you feel about
The Dead Boys’ version of “Sonic Reducer”? What was the idea of the sonic
reducer?

I’m not keen on it– the
vocals are overcooked– but maybe also it’s because it’s the source of
the one piece of bitterness I have in my career. When Gene asked if they
could use some of the material I told him he could have it all, take all
the credit, but NOT Sonic Reducer. They could use Sonic Reducer but they
couldn’t pile on the writer credits. But they did. Gene and I remain friends
but he knows how I feel and we avoid the conversation. I think I explained
sonic reduction as well as it can be done in the liner notes.

What do you think of
the subsequent near-deification of Peter Laughner in the rock and fan press?
What are your memories of him now? How important was his input/role in
Rocket? What do you think he would have done had he lived? You ever read
Lester Bangs’s tribute to him? What did you think of that?

I have nothing to say to
outsiders about Peter. Do what you want. Believe what you want. Use him
for any agenda you have in mind. Leave me out of it.

Do you see a direct
line of descent from RFTT through to your current stuff?

Yes.

Do you ever get sad
and nostalgic for those “different times”? Could rock music ever be so
free and full of possibilities again?

I am not nostalgic. Rock
music remains the only music that is free and full of possibilities. All
the endless variants of dance / ambiance are a deadend. Jazz suffers on
without the human voice and rose as far as it could under that restriction
many years ago. World Music is MOR background music for TV shows about
women’s problems. No, I am not nostalgic. I still walk the narrow road.
Say, how’s things in YOUR town?

Do you think of Crocus
Behemoth as being a different person? How do you feel about that particular
incarnation?

No. And there was no “incarnation.”
It was simply an alias to disguise the fact that I was writing inordinate
amounts of the magazine. I happened to use it for certain kinds of writing
that became “popular” among the readers so I kept it as a commercial or
ego consideration. Also because it’s an artifact of the year I spent in
a White Panther commune it had fond personal memories for me but that’s
about it.

"DISASTODROME!"

19 JULY 2002: “DISASTODROME!”

David Thomas

FROM UCLA
WEBSITE
:

Disastodrome! is a 3-day
festival.
Sixteen avant-garage heroes, boundary breakers forever outside
the world of music-by-numbers, are led into the Moment by one of rock’s
great prodigies and Pere Ubu founder, David Thomas.

Friday, Feb 21

Caligari’s Diner

Individual voices and unique
visions bellied up to the bar at Caligari’s Diner, featuring the pale boys,
and the electrifying Kidney Brothers, the duo that pinned a Purcell Room
audience to the back of their seats at the London Disastodrome. Plus absolutely
special guests.

Saturday, Feb 22

Mirror Man

The U.S. premiere of the
improvisational opera featuring David Thomas, Linda Thompson, Bob Holman,
Van Dyke Parks, Robert Kidney and always special guests. “A tour de force,”
says Mojo. “Evokes the restless hobo spirit of Harry Partch,” says Time
Out London. “A contemporary update of the Kerouac era,” says The Guardian.

Sunday, Feb 23

Custodians of the Avant-Garage

Pere Ubu, Rocket From The
Tombs and guests. Any appearance by Ubu is special enough but this night
features the one-off reunion of the truly legendary
Rocket From The Tombs.


 

AND:
CHECK THE UBU PROJEX WEBSITE.

YOUR GOVERNMENT IN ACTION:"THE REDUCING AMERICANS' VULNERABILITY TO ECSTASY ACT OF 2002"

18 JULY 2002: YOUR GOVERNMENT
IN ACTION:  “THE REDUCING AMERICANS’ VULNERABILITY TO ECSTASY ACT
OF 2002”


 

Ravers against the machine

Party-goers, ACLU take on
ŒEcstasy‚ legislation

By David Montgomery

THE
WASHINGTON POST

July 18 ˜ Two young women
on an urgent mission have been lugging boxes into the offices of U.S. senators
this week. The boxes contain petitions an inch thick, one for each senator.
Nearly 10,000 signatures were collected over the Internet in five days.


       
THE PETITIONS declare: „This bill is a serious threat to civil liberties,
freedom of speech and the right to dance.‰


      
Look out, Congress: The ravers are coming.


      
„We‚re offended by the fact they‚re blackballing an entire musical genre,‰
said Amanda Huie, checking senators‚ names off her list Tuesday afternoon.

      
The genre in question is electronic dance music, which fans enjoy at all-night
parties called raves. Legislation in Congress could hold promoters responsible
if people attending the events use illegal drugs such as Ecstasy, the party
drug frequently associated with raves.


      
The Reducing Americans‚ Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act of 2002 ˜ or the RAVE
Act ˜ has cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee and is on the consent
calendar, meaning it could receive final approval without a roll call vote
at any time. When he introduced the bill in June, Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.)
said „most raves are havens for illicit drugs,‰ and congressional findings
submitted with the bill label as drug paraphernalia such rave mainstays
as bottled water, „chill rooms‰ and glow sticks.


      
The bill would expand the existing federal crack house law, which makes
it a felony to provide a space for the purpose of illegal drug use, to
cover promoters of raves and other events.


      
Another bill pending in the House ˜ the Clean, Learn, Educate, Abolish,
Neutralize and Undermine Production (CLEAN-UP) of Methamphetamines Act,
introduced by Rep. Doug Ose (R-Calif.) ˜ goes further. It would hold concert
promoters in violation if they „reasonably ought to know‰ that someone
will use an illegal drug during an event.


      
The House bill has 67 sponsors but has languished in committee since February,
while in one month the RAVE Act ˜ sponsored by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa),
Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.)
˜ has sailed smoothly to the brink of approval.

ŒAN INNOCUOUS BILL‚

      
Caught by surprise, some ravers briefly considered a more theatrical protest
on the Hill, perhaps showing off totems of their culture-rainbow hair,
baggy pants, extended trance jams and those controversial glow sticks.
But no. This is Washington, and ravers know the folkways. Huie, dressed
quietly in slacks and shirt, said people from 49 states signed the petition.
(Ravers must be scarce in North Dakota.)


         
„This is a petition about S. 2633,‰ Huie told receptionists in office after
office, referring to the bill number with insider aplomb. She is the marketing
director of Buzzlife Productions, a Washington promoter.


      
Biden‚s staff has been surprised, too ˜ by the sudden outcry. „We thought
this would be an innocuous bill that everybody would rally in support of,‰
said Alan Hoffman, Biden‚s chief of staff.


      
After all, the bill merely adjusts the wording of the so-called crack house
law. For example, crack houses are fixed indoor locations; the RAVE Act
would also cover temporary outdoor venues.


      
So what?


      
„It violates the First Amendment,‰ said Marv Johnson, an attorney for the
American Civil Liberties Union.

      
Johnson argues that while there is no constitutional right to smoke crack,
there is, in fact, a right to dance. Music and dance are protected forms
of free expression, he said. By extending the crack house law to dance
parties, the RAVE Act would discourage promoters from sponsoring this kind
of art, he said.


      
The ACLU was caught as flat-footed as the ravers, and is seeking a senator
to put a „hold‰ on the bill, to get it off the consent calendar and force
a voice vote.


      
Biden rejects the ACLU‚s characterization. The issue is the drugs, he said,
not the music. The bill was prompted by unsuccessful prosecutions of rave
promoters under the crack house law. Introducing the bill, Biden said Ecstasy
is responsible for thousands of overdoses and some deaths, and its abuse
by teenagers has jumped 71 percent since 1999. He said police investigations
in several cities demonstrate that raves are a favorite place to buy, sell
and take Ecstasy tablets.


      
Some promoters distribute fliers bearing pictures of pills or argot for
Ecstasy such as „E‰ or „X‰ or „Rollin‚ ‰ ˜ evidence that doing drugs is
part of the purpose of those raves, Biden said. Under his bill, only promoters
who stage events for that purpose would be prosecuted.


      
But that may not be much of a safeguard for legitimate promoters, according
to the ACLU and rave advocates. The congressional findings attached to
the bill bluntly state that „the trafficking and use of Œclub drugs‚ .
. . is deeply embedded in the rave culture.‰ The findings become part of
the legislative history of the bill and could support a prosecutor‚s claim
that any rave should be suspect, Johnson said. The RAVE Act provides for
civil penalties of $250,000 or twice the gross proceeds of the rave, requiring
a lower burden of proof than the crack house law‚s criminal penalties,
Johnson said.


      
„The way the system really works is, you arrest and accuse and then you
fight it out in court,‰ said Lonnie Fisher, president of Ultraworld Productions
in Baltimore. „They could break the back of a small promoter financially.‰

NO ROCK ACT

      
But Grassley, in a statement yesterday, said the RAVE Act is an appropriate
extension of the crack house law: „There are people who host raves so they
can sell Ecstasy, just as there are people who rent houses so they can
sell drugs. We‚ve seen raves advertised as safe, alcohol-free and drug-free
places for kids to socialize and dance. If this is what the promoter actually
intends, then they don‚t have anything to worry about.‰


      
Ravers seem most offended by what they say is another smear to the reputation
of their strobe-lit scene. They contend that police, politicians and media
have exaggerated the amount of criminal activity in rave culture since
it began more than a decade ago. There are plenty of drugs at rock shows,
too, ravers claim, yet no senator has proposed a ROCK Act.


      
„This bill seems to imply that people go to raves to do drugs, and the
music is there to accentuate the drug experience,‰ said Luciana Lopez of
Washington, who is protesting the legislation. A copy editor for a science
journal, she said she neither drinks nor uses drugs ˜ but does wear green
and blue wigs to raves.


      
„This culture is really important to me,‰ she said. She described the euphoria
of dancing for hours with people who may start as strangers but who by
early the next morning are exchanging hugs and phone numbers. „It makes
you feel part of a community,‰ she said.


      
The water and the „chill rooms‰ are for cooling off after dancing, she
said, not because so many ravers are overheated on Ecstasy. And the glow
sticks look cool.

      
Lopez and many Washington ravers are found Friday nights at Buzz, the weekly
rave party sponsored by Buzzlife at Nation, the club on Half Street SE.
The cover charge is $15 before 11 p.m., $20 after, and the dancing stops
at 6 a.m., according to Huie.


      
Three years ago, a local television station went undercover at Buzz and
broadcast alleged drug use. In the welter of bad publicity, Buzz temporarily
shut down. The ravers claimed the discovery of drugs was blown out of proportion.
Now ravers must empty their pockets at the door, according to Huie.


      
Congress has taken up the issue of rave culture at least once before. A
year ago, as part of a celebration of Detroit‚s tricentennial, the House
and Senate passed a resolution congratulating the city for, among other
things, helping to pioneer techno, the electronic dance music popular at
raves.

"OUR WOMEN ARE WITHOUT FEAR."

17 JULY 2002: “OUR WOMEN
ARE WITHOUT FEAR.”

Women occupying the ChevronTexaco
oil export terminal in Escravos take their afternoon nap at the terminal’s
airport on Tuesday, July 16, 2002. The women said that they will occupy
the terminal until they get final documentation from the company offering
local residents jobs, schools, water, electricity and other amenities.
(AP Photo/Saurabh Das)

Nigerian Women Storm ChevronTexaco

Wed Jul 17,10:02 AM ET

ESCRAVOS, Nigeria (AP) –
Unarmed women stormed four ChevronTexaco oil pipeline stations in southeastern
Nigeria, a prominent activist said Wednesday.


    The takeovers
came as signs of an ethnic dispute emerged in a separate 10-day occupation
of the company’s main oil terminal in the Niger Delta region.


    Kingsley
Kuku, spokesman for the ethnic Ijaw Youth Council, said hundreds of
unarmed Ijaw women captured four pipeline flowstations in boats on Tuesday
.


    An unknown
number of employees at the sites were “allowed to leave,” he said. He did
not know if any workers remained inside.


    Wole
Agunbiade, a spokesman for ChevronTexaco’s Nigeria subsidiary, could neither
confirm nor deny the reported takeover.

    Kuku
said the latest protests occurred near the villages of Opueketa, Abiteye,
Makaraba and Otunana.


    They
are some 50 miles east of Escravos, ChevronTexaco’s multimillion-dollar
oil export terminal where a separate group of unarmed village women has
been holed up since sneaking inside on July 8.


    “Our
women are without fear. They are participating actively in our struggle
and have embarked on this action without the use of arms, not even brooms,”
Kuku said.


    He warned
that Ijaw men would “burn down all Chevron oil facilities” if police or
soldiers tried to forcibly remove the women protesters or otherwise harmed
them.


    The latest
action was launched to force the oil giant to grant jobs and help improve
living conditions of nearby villagers, Kuku said.


    Lucky
Lelekumo, a spokeswoman for the Ijaw women, said in a statement quoted
by the daily Punch newspaper that the action was to draw attention to widespread
poverty in villages with “nothing to show for over 30 years of the company’s
existence.”

    The protesters
also hoped to force the state government to give assurances that Ijaws
would be granted favorable municipal council boundaries delineating the
tribe’s lands from rival Itsekiri areas, Kuku said.


    The Ijaws
accused the women who raided the Escravos terminal of using their siege
to pry government concessions in a yearslong land dispute between Ijaws
and Itsekiris. Although the Escravos protesters include women from several
different ethnic groups, the core group is Itsekiri.


    Anino
Olowu, a representative of the women still inside Escravos on Wednesday,
denied her protest was linked to the land dispute, or to the Ijaw action.

THANKS TO JOSHUA B.!

"Music is not the food of love. The pies are so much better."

15 JULY 2002: “Music
is not the food of love. The pies are so much better.”

www.squarepiecompany.com

“This was the Glastonbury
of food, Pastie-onbury, maybe except I didn’t have


a pastie. But man, the Square
Pie Company was for me the equal of Pulp


headlining in 1995. 
Their World Cup Pie cam with a bostin’ mash and gravy


that could mount a healthy
takeover bid on Heavens Ambrosia”


                   

Caitlin Moran, The Times, Mon 1st July

 

Quick update on the Square
Pie World Cup
, apologies for the late result but


we’ve all been down in Glastonbury
Festival selling pies, which was


fantastic.

The Pie World Cup finished
on Sunday with a play off between the favourites


England Steak and Kidney
Pie and the dependable Irish Lamb Stew.  Both teams

went for it from the beginning
and in the highest scoring game of the


tournament so far both teams
sold out by the end of the day – we had made


the same amount of each
to be fair.  In the end the Cup went to the English


Steak and Kidney on a Golden
Pie
as they sold out quicker than the Irish.


The Steak and Kidney will
now become a permanent fixture on the Square Pie


menu at the shop in Spitalfields
Market and after some great reaction other

world cup pies will come
back as weekly special now and then, namely the


Uruguayan Rabbit, Spanish
Chorizo, French Beef Bourguignon,  Irish Lamb Stew


and the amazing Senegalese
Chicken Yasser.
  We will never sell a
German


Bratwurst
and Sauer Kraut pie again.

Other pie news, the shop
has just adopted Gordon the baby Orangutan at


Monkey World in Dorset
and will be making a special pie in the shop based on

what the primates eat
down there.
Well that’s the idea.  We’re chatting to


the wardens down there and
the chimps seem to have pretty upmarket


tatsetbuds so we’ll let
you know when we come up with the final recipe. For


each sale of these pies
we will make a donation to Monkey World which


rehabilitates abused Chimps,
Orangs and  other primates.  More on this to

come soon when we sort it
all out.

Also heres a good pie link

http://www.weebl.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/b3ta/pie.html

Thanks

Martin

Any more info please see
the website www.squarepiecompany.com
or call Martin


on 07785 535607

The Square Pie Company

27 Parmiter Industrial Centre

Parmiter St

London

E2 9HZ

Tel:   020 8980
2051


Mob: 07785 535607

WHAT POOR FARMERS HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO.

14 JULY 2002: WHAT POOR
FARMERS HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO.



(LEFT)   
An armed boy walks away from a fire in San Salvador Atenco. About 900 policemen
have surrounded the site of the standoff.


(Agence France-Presse)
(RIGHT)  Residents of San Salvador Atenco capture and disarm a policeman,
center. Farmers in the Mexican town are holding hostages to protest the
expropriation of their land for an airport. (Associated Press)

FROM THE
L.A. TIMES
:

Mexican Farmers Take 3
More Hostages

Standoff: Now holding 15
captives, they demand formal talks in land dispute.


By RICHARD BOUDREAUX, Times
Staff Writer

MEXICO CITY — Farmers armed
with machetes and homemade firebombs took three more hostages Saturday
and demanded formal negotiations to end their violent standoff with the
government over plans to build an airport on their land 18 miles northeast
of Mexico City.

The showdown was in its third
day with no sign of a breakthrough. Hundreds of protesters are now holding
15 captives in the tense, barricaded town of San Salvador Atenco, which
is surrounded by about 900 riot policemen. Police have jailed two protest
leaders and 10 followers.

Federal authorities last
October ordered 13,300 acres in the rural municipality expropriated for
the $2.3-billion airport, setting off months of sporadic protests that
exploded in violence late Thursday. The farmers seized government offices
in the town, abducted local officials, hijacked and burned vehicles, and
attacked policemen with machetes. About 30 people were injured.

Protest organizers and officials
of the state of Mexico have been on the phone at least five times since
then, trying to work out an exchange of captives.

Those talks hit a snag Friday,
despite jailed protest leader Ignacio del Valle’s telephone appeal to followers
to accept the state’s offer. Under that proposal, Del Valle and Adan Espinoza,
who face charges of inciting violence and stabbing a policeman, would stay
in jail but the 10 other protesters and all the hostages would go free.

A rowdy assembly of farmers
in the town’s auditorium shouted down the proposal. Participants said Del
Valle must have endorsed it under duress. “They’re torturing him!” one
farmer shouted.

At a news conference late
Friday, other protesters again insisted on the release of all 12 prisoners.
They demanded that the federal government, not the state, take charge of
the conflict and agree to formal negotiations through a mediator. They
proposed three human rights champions to play that role.

President Vicente Fox’s administration
has tried to stay out of the conflict, saying the airport construction
would continue as planned. However, Interior Minister Santiago Creel said
federal officials were ready to negotiate with any group disposed to a
peaceful settlement–but would “act with a firm hand to avoid an increase
of violence.”

About 34,000 people live
in villages and farmland destined for the new six-runway facility that
would replace Mexico City’s Benito Juarez International Airport. Many object
that the federal government’s offer to buy their land for 70 cents per
square meter is too low, while others refuse to leave at any price.

The dispute has put Fox’s
government at odds with its erstwhile leftist ally, the Democratic Revolution
Party. Rosario Robles, the party’s leader, called Saturday for a “human
fence” around San Salvador Atenco, saying its residents must be protected.

The protesters took three
more hostages Saturday, identifying them as undercover state police officers
posing as journalists.

For the second day in a row,
leaders of the uprising brought hostages before TV cameras to show that
they had not been harmed. They include several policemen and state officials.
Some took the opportunity to talk to reporters.

“I call on my superiors,
on state officials and on President Fox not to abandon us,” said Jose Andres
Mediola, a deputy state prosecutor and the most prominent hostage. “I want
to go home. I want to feel like authorities and the government are doing
all they can to get me there.”

"IN ECUADOR'S BANANA FIELDS, CHILD LABOR IS KEY TO PROFITS."

13 JULY 2002: “IN ECUADOR’S
BANANA FIELDS, CHILD LABOR IS KEY TO PROFITS.”


A group of 10- and 11-year-old
boys outside an


Ecuadorean banana plantation
where they work.


Child labor has endured
in Latin America


despite efforts to abolish
it.

FROM THE
NEW YORK TIMES:

July 13, 2002

In Ecuador’s Banana Fields,
Child Labor Is Key to Profits


By JUAN FORERO

PUERTO INCA, Ecuador ˜ At
Los Álamos plantation, it would appear that no expense was spared
to produce the Bonita brand Cavendish bananas sold in the United States.

The modern 3,000-acre hacienda
in this steamy corner of Ecuador, one of the most efficient in Latin America,
employs some 1,300 workers to tend banana plants fed by a state-of-the-art
irrigation system.

The owner is Álvaro
Noboa, Ecuador’s richest man and a worldly bon vivant. He has become the
leading candidate for president with the help of a slick marketing campaign
that has cast him as a populist friend of the poor. “I love the workers
at Los Álamos,” Mr. Noboa told local reporters in May, when he announced
his candidacy.

But in interviews, a dozen
children and many adults spoke of child laborers at Los Álamos,
among them a spindly-armed 10-year-old, Esteban Menéndez. “I come
here after school and I work here all day,” Esteban said. “I have to work
to help my father, to help him make money.”

The presence of children
on the plantation of a man who may win Ecuador’s presidential election
in October is one of the more glaring examples of how enduring the use
of child labor remains in Latin America, where some 42
million children from ages 5 to 14
have been estimated to be working
in recent years.

The problem has been made
more durable still by the competition that comes with a consolidated global
market. Pressures on businesses to be efficient and profitable are often
passed on to the world’s most vulnerable population, its poorest children.

Growers and exporters here,
who supply 25 percent of the bananas eaten in the United States, say the
product earns them about 30 percent less today than a decade ago, often
prompting them to turn a blind eye to labor codes. Child labor is common
on plantations, large and small.

Meanwhile, grim economic
realities leave families more than ready to send their boys, and sometimes
girls, out to work, even if it means pulling them out of school and placing
them in fields or factories where they are exposed to hazardous conditions
for little or no pay.

For two years, Esteban and
his family say, the boy has bounded up 15-foot banana plants, tying insecticide-laced
cords between them to stabilize trunks that might otherwise collapse under
the weight of the produce that is behind Mr. Noboa’s fortune of over $1
billion.

He works for nothing to help
his father, who tends 98 acres, avoid having his pay docked.

“That is the life of my sons,
working in the bananas at such a young age,” said Esteban’s mother, Benita
Menéndez, 36, who has had three sons working at Mr. Noboa’s plantation,
only one of them an adult. “I did not want them to work when they were
little, but this is the reality.”

Ecuador’s problem is less
severe than that of other countries in the region. Even so, the International
Labor Organization estimated that 69,000 children ages 10 to 14, and an
additional 325,000 young people ages 15 to 19, were working here in 1999.

Only a significant increase
in wages, at best a distant prospect in a country where the average worker
earns $5.74 a day, will keep families from sending their children out into
the fields, labor advocates here and in the United States say.

But while rights activists
regard such labor as unacceptable, many parents like Mr. and Mrs. Menéndez
see it as a necessity.

When several plantations,
fearing unwanted attention, dismissed their child workers after a damning
114-page report in April by Human Rights Watch, the action was taken as
a disaster by families across the lush banana belt of southern Ecuador
˜ the world’s largest banana exporter and an increasingly important source
for American corporations like Dole and Del Monte, according to the report.

“They fired all the children,
but the work they did helped us,” complained María Narváez,
31, whose two sons, Néstor and Luis Boa, 12 and 13, were dismissed
from a big hacienda where they earned $3 a day. “The situation is such
that we all have to pitch in.”

At Los Álamos, which
supplies the world’s fourth-largest banana company, labor conditions have
become increasingly contentious. Employees’ efforts to organize for better
wages and working conditions led to a violent standoff this year ˜ a dispute
that simmers today in the form of an intermittent strike by some families,
including Esteban’s own.

The workers unionized in
March. The company responded by dismissing more than 120 of them.

When the workers occupied
part of the hacienda, guards armed with shotguns, some wearing hoods, arrived
at 2 a.m. on May 16, according to workers, and fired on some who had refused
to move from the entrance gate, wounding two.

The guards, workers said,
then entered the grounds and burst into barracks where other workers were
sleeping and forced them out.

The next afternoon, workers
again gathered at the gate, where they parked a bus across the road to
block delivery trucks. The guards confronted them again, this time wounding
seven more ˜ including Esteban’s father, Bernabé Menéndez
˜ and a policeman.

“It was an attack on innocent
people,” said Jan Nimmo, a Scottish labor advocate who was with the workers
that day and videotaped the afternoon confrontation at the gate.

Mr. Noboa’s lawyer, Rafael
Pino, attributed the violence to the workers, saying the guards had been
sent in to protect property that was being vandalized. “At no moment were
there shots from our side,” he said.

But the violence prompted
the United States Embassy to ask the government to ensure the safety of
the striking workers. An American delegation that included two members
of Congressional staffs visited Los Álamos workers in June.

“This is sort of the underbelly
of globalization,” said Representative George Miller, a California Democrat
who sent an aide to Ecuador.

“We ask for labor protections
and we ask for environmental protections,” Mr. Miller said, “and we’re
told we can’t have them, and when the citizens of that country try to get
those protections, they’re met with force from the company to keep that
from happening.”

After the confrontation at
Los Álamos, a Chicago-based labor rights group, the U.S./Labor Education
in the Americas Project, began pressing Costco, a distributor of Bonita
bananas, to lean on Mr. Noboa to improve labor conditions.

Under pressure, his banana
company has promised to improve medical services, provide masks, gloves
and other equipment and settle complaints about unpaid overtime wages.
But it has refused to recognize the workers’ unions, Labor Ministry officials
said.

Mr. Noboa, who divides much
of his time between Guayaquil and New York, declined to be interviewed,
and campaign aides did not return phone calls and e-mail messages seeking
comment. But his lawyer, Mr. Pino, said children under 14, who are tightly
restricted from working under Ecuador’s labor laws, did not work at Los
Álamos. “Impossible,” he said in an interview. “To violate the law
cannot be done, and it is not the company policy either.”

Though no one knows exactly
how many children work on the large plantations across Ecuador, Sergio
Seminario, an analyst and former president of the Association of Banana
Exporters, estimated 6,000, with thousands more working on small family
farms.

The Labor Ministry has long
been aware of the problem in the industry, which accounts for 20 percent
of Ecuador’s exports. But Alberto Montalvo, the highest-ranking ministry
official in this region, said it was difficult to root out. “We all believe
in human rights and labor rights,” he said. “It is all very beautiful,
but we also have to recognize that all the members of families have to
work to pay for basic needs.”

The existence of child labor
on plantations is a product of simple arithmetic. Workers receive so little
in part because the wholesalers and retailers abroad reap most of the profits,
particularly with the recent consolidation of huge retail outlets like
Wal-Mart, Costco and Carrefour.

Each 43-pound box of bananas
purchased here by exporters for $2 or $3 goes for $25 in the United States
or Europe. The Ecuadorean grower makes 12 cents on the dollar, according
to the National Association of Banana Growers. “These big chains say, `We
will buy your bananas off the boat, but at our price,’ ” Mr. Seminario
said. “So the exporter has learned that to sell to those chains he must
sell at their price.”

If the growers are squeezed,
the banana workers feel the pain. Their work force is almost entirely nonunion,
and workers are often deliberately shifted from one payroll to another
by growers who set up multiple companies on paper to avoid paying benefits
and higher wages.

The workers and their children
here said difficult conditions had long been the norm at Los Álamos.
The families who live here in Puerto Inca cram themselves into crude cinder-block
houses with tin roofs. Indoor plumbing is rare.

The main earners among several
families said they received $6 to $7 a day ˜ within Ecuador’s minimum wage
of $128 a month ˜ but were often expected to work six or seven days a week,
failing to earn the overtime pay set by law.

The monthly minimum they
earn falls far short of the $220 the government says a poor family of four
needs to meet basic needs, so children go to work.

“With my husband’s salary,
we did not have enough for school, not enough for food,” said Patricia
Céspedes, explaining why she had pulled her nephew out of school
at age 11 and sent him to work at Mr. Noboa’s hacienda. The boy, Máximo
Gómez, whom Ms. Céspedes has raised since his mother’s death,
is now 14 and a veteran field hand.

Esteban goes to school in
addition to working. But many families say they earn so little that they
must choose which of their children to educate and which to send into the
factories and fields. Such economic necessity keeps 55 percent of Ecuadorean
children from attending secondary school, the World Bank says.

Mr. Noboa remains a frequent
visitor to New York, where, according to his spokesman, Pablo Martínez,
he mingles with the Rockefellers and other luminaries. When his son was
christened at St. Patrick’s Cathedral last year, an event shown on Ecuadorean
television, Robert Kennedy Jr. served as the godfather.

But Mr. Noboa’s great hope
is to reach the presidency, which he failed to win in 1998. Mr. Noboa has
portrayed himself as an outsider whose policies will improve life for most
Ecuadoreans.

He has made no extensive
public remarks about the dispute with the workers at Los Álamos.
In fact, the poor labor conditions and the existence of child workers have
made barely a political ripple here. An investigation of the shootings
at Los Álamos has not led to any arrests, nor has it shed light
on what happened.

Mr. Noboa’s aides say the
troubles on his hacienda are politically motivated efforts to embarrass
him in the midst of a presidential campaign.

“If he wasn’t running for
president and wasn’t the richest man in Ecuador, this wouldn’t be happening,”
Mr. Martínez said.