Cheney ‘cabal’ hijacked foreign policy
By Edward Alden in Washington
Published: October 20 2005 00:00, Financial Times
ÔøºVice-President Dick Cheney and a handful of others had hijacked the government’s foreign policy apparatus, deciding in secret to carry out policies that had left the US weaker and more isolated in the world, the top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell claimed on Wednesday.
In a scathing attack on the record of President George W. Bush, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Mr Powell until last January, said: ÄúWhat I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made.
ÄúNow it is paying the consequences of making those decisions in secret, but far more telling to me is America is paying the consequences.Äù
ÔøºMr Wilkerson said such secret decision-making was responsible for mistakes such as the long refusal to engage with North Korea or to back European efforts on Iran.
It also resulted in bitter battles in the administration among those excluded from the decisions.
ÄúIf you’re not prepared to stop the feuding elements in the bureaucracy as they carry out your decisions, you are courting disaster. And I would say that we have courted disaster in Iraq, in North Korea, in Iran.Äù
The comments, made at the New America Foundation, a Washington think-tank, were the harshest attack on the administration by a former senior official since criticisms by Richard Clarke, former White House terrorism czar, and Paul O’Neill, former Treasury secretary, early last year.
Mr Wilkerson said his decision to go public had led to a personal falling out with Mr Powell, whom he served for 16 years at the Pentagon and the State Department.
ÄúHe’s not happy with my speaking out because, and I admire this in him, he is the world’s most loyal soldier.”
Among his other charges:
ñ The detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere was Äúa concrete exampleÄù of the decision-making problem, with the president and other top officials in effect giving the green light to soldiers to abuse detainees. ÄúYou don’t have this kind of pervasive attitude out there unless you’ve condoned it.Äù
ñ Condoleezza Rice, the former national security adviser and now secretary of state, was Äúpart of the problemÄù. Instead of ensuring that Mr Bush received the best possible advice, Äúshe would side with the president to build her intimacy with the presidentÄù.
ñ The military, particularly the army and marine corps, is overstretched and demoralised. Officers, Mr Wilkerson claimed, Äústart voting with their feet, as they did in Vietnam. . . and all of a sudden your military begins to unravelÄù.
Mr Wilkerson said former president George H.W. Bush Äúone of the finest presidents we have ever hadÄù understood how to make foreign policy work. In contrast, he said, his son was Äúnot versed in international relations and not too much interested in them either.”
ÄúThere’s a vast difference between the way George H.W. Bush dealt with major challenges, some of the greatest challenges at the end of the 20th century, and effected positive results in my view, and the way we conduct diplomacy today.Äù